TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agoIt'll happen to you!lemm.eeimagemessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up11.24Karrow-down15
arrow-up11.23Karrow-down1imageIt'll happen to you!lemm.eeTheImpressiveX@lemm.ee to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square125fedilink
minus-squareAllHailTheSheeplinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agodoesn’t this suggest that my 27" monitor I sit a foot away from should just be 480p? that seems a little noticable to me
minus-squareLeFrog@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up18·edit-21 month agoI think you got this wrong. If you sit 0.3 m away, more than 4k is worth it.
minus-squareAllHailTheSheeplinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 month agoyou’re right lol. at first glance I thought the y axis was in inches not feet. make sense now lol
minus-squareJuniper (she/her) 🫐@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 month agoI think you’re misreading ’ as " If it’s 27" and 1’ away that puts it into the highest resolution category
minus-squareAllHailTheSheeplinkfedilinkarrow-up4·1 month agoindeed! im a computer science student who can’t read a graph, that’s tough haha
doesn’t this suggest that my 27" monitor I sit a foot away from should just be 480p? that seems a little noticable to me
I think you got this wrong. If you sit 0.3 m away, more than 4k is worth it.
you’re right lol. at first glance I thought the y axis was in inches not feet. make sense now lol
I think you’re misreading ’ as "
If it’s 27" and 1’ away that puts it into the highest resolution category
indeed! im a computer science student who can’t read a graph, that’s tough haha