Nope. It’s the paradox of tolerance you’re upset about.
Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim. You mocking someone about thier appearance is, yup, CHILDISH.
It’s really weird how much emotion is in all of these responses but it’s really silly when you then claim I am being emotional.
I’ve made no claims to my moral superiority but you and other have. That is a paradox.
We disagree on something. Calling me childish is a bully tactic.
I am true to myself and that offends people in weird silly ways. It results in them applying their imagined prejudices to me.
These are all logical fallacies and if there is one thing I’ve learned over the year is that those who deploy them are not worth arguing with and this is such an occurrence.
I knew it would lead here because the internet is predictable because people are predictable.
For example you will now ignore me or responses with an emotional response, dismisal of my position and list of logical facllicies you feel I am using because you aren’t interesting in a discussion.
You’re literally just defending why it’s ok for you to be a bad person.
All I did was call out people for being bad people. You getting offended and defending why making fun of people is ok is childish. You then getting offended about being called about just proves how immature you are.
Nope. It’s the paradox of tolerance you’re upset about.
Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim. You mocking someone about thier appearance is, yup, CHILDISH.
It’s really weird how much emotion is in all of these responses but it’s really silly when you then claim I am being emotional.
I’ve made no claims to my moral superiority but you and other have. That is a paradox.
We disagree on something. Calling me childish is a bully tactic.
I am true to myself and that offends people in weird silly ways. It results in them applying their imagined prejudices to me.
These are all logical fallacies and if there is one thing I’ve learned over the year is that those who deploy them are not worth arguing with and this is such an occurrence.
I knew it would lead here because the internet is predictable because people are predictable.
For example you will now ignore me or responses with an emotional response, dismisal of my position and list of logical facllicies you feel I am using because you aren’t interesting in a discussion.
You need me to be a bad person
You’re literally just defending why it’s ok for you to be a bad person.
All I did was call out people for being bad people. You getting offended and defending why making fun of people is ok is childish. You then getting offended about being called about just proves how immature you are.
Be better
The issue here is still you thinking I’m offended. I’m not. You continue to insist I am and insist you know my motivations.
You and I disagree I what a bad person is. I can accept that. Why can’t you?
I posted this knowing it would get called out. Literally just said that. It appears you’ve having trouble understanding what I am saying.
I think this makes you a bad person. If you disagree then by your own rules that makes you childish. Does this help you see the fallacy of your logic?
You’re not offended, you just continuously respond defending someone who would theoretically be offended.
Got it