Summary

Elon Musk’s net worth has dropped by $110.8 billion since its peak in December 2024, largely due to Tesla’s stock decline following Donald Trump’s new tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China.

However, his close ties to Trump and influence over government contracts, including Starlink deals, may help him recover.

  • jballs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Barring personal disaster, they will never be poor.

    I’m trying to think what personal disaster could possibly happen to render Elon poor. I feel like a new administration could come in, declare him a traitor, cease all his assets, and he still wouldn’t be poor. Once you’ve got that kind of money, I’m sure you have millions squirreled away here and there.

      • jballs
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        His head in a basket would still be rich as hell

        • xmunk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 days ago

          I’m okay with that. It’s free to enjoy the cash as much as it wants.

    • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Once you’ve got that kind of money, I’m sure you have millions squirreled away here and there.

      That’s kind of right. He likely has liquid funds stuffed away in all kinds of places, possibly in different currencies on different continents. The only way to put someone like this in the poorhouse is to bankrupt every single one of his investments, while simultaneously freezing all his funds internationally.

      From a finance perspective, a billionaire is a few orders of magnitude beyond “escape velocity” from ever being poor. I think most of us would need a few tens-of-millions USD in cash to even consider achieving such a thing.

      Another way to look at it is that the billions in “net worth” he has accumulated are just ablative armor for real spendable wealth. Consider the move he made with Twitter: the objective was controlling the platform and discourse on it, full stop. Losing tens of billions didn’t matter - it wasn’t real money in the first place (mostly stock) and wasn’t spendable in the conventional sense. DOGE is a similar play in that the kinds of unfair advantages being gained are worth at least what he’s losing.