Not a parent but I read this and have my personal opinions, curious what others think about it.

  • ted
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The bathroom thing just illustrates that we don’t accommodate kids in our society. There are probably more kids in the population who could use low sinks than you see because our public spaces are so hostile to them.

    It’s more common in Europe (e.g. Sweden) for folks to bring their kids everywhere, and the physicality of those locations accommodates them because they are more present.

    The bathroom argument that you made is akin to saying that folks shouldn’t feel entitled to bike lines / safe sidewalks because our cities were designed for cars and sidewalks and bike lanes are expensive for a tiny percent of the moving population.

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Wouldn’t it be easier to have stools available that a kid could pull up to the sink to use a normal height sink, than to have sinks that are exclusively useful by kids?

      The bathroom argument that you made is akin to saying that folks shouldn’t feel entitled to bike lines / safe sidewalks because our cities were designed for cars and sidewalks and bike lanes are expensive for a tiny percent of the moving population.

      Bike lanes are installed by the government using taxpayer funding. Bathrooms (in non-public spaces) are installed by private companies. Difference in expectations there, for sure.

      • ted
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Stools are a great solution!