• Jakeroxs
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Fair enough, I’ve been using it for like 10 years 🤷‍♂️

    You also didn’t specify anything about open source in the original comment lol

    • goldfndr@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Ah, someone with experience with Solid Explorer. I’m hopeful you might be a power user.

      Long ago, I looked into it, but was dissuaded because the details views therein seemed to waste vertical whitespace. An absurdly small font, close to the bottom of the icon to maximize empty vertical space, was used for details (at least datestamp, I think).

      Is that still the case? Have they added a method to increase the font size of the details without also increasing (or perhaps simultaneously decreasing) the filename’s font’s size? I couldn’t find one when I tried it last.

      If there’s an interview with the creators wherein they extol the virtues of vertical whitespace within an item, or if some reviewer has done that for them, I’d love a link or two to read about it, see what I’m missing.

      I’m sure the functionality is great. It’s the presentation I didn’t like. But perhaps there are unintended consequences of a compact layout…

      • Jakeroxs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Haha depends on what you mean, this is the default view I believe just zoomed out (pinched, rather then swapping to the compact view, which gets rid of the timestamp)

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, it was more of a rant, I wasn’t exactly asking for suggestions. But you making a suggestion was perfectly fine anyways. I do just have opinions on proprietary Android apps.