Well first you’d have to actually be correct in your assessment of the situation, while the poster is just masturbating their ego without ever even considering taking more than a cursory glance at the real world.
Many disparate bad actors are exploiting information technology to attempt building false narratives to forward their goals. Regardless of what you believe is the best option politically, if you continue to consume these false realities you’re going to do far more harm to your causes than good.
You’re being deliberately disingenuous in your interpretation, but I’ll respond anyways for the benefit of others here.
What I suggest is that if you truly care deeply about these issues, you should devote quite a bit more time and effort into actually learning about it and related subjects, and seeking meaningful ways to get personally involved in a much more impactful position. Try starting here if you need a push in the right direction.
Honestly, how you managed to figure that learning and counterinsurgency equates to armed rebellion can’t really be explained any other way than you’re being deliberately obtuse.
Iirc it’s more like vandalize factories and act like you don’t know anything.
If you identify as a resistance person, a socialist, an anarchist, a communist, and those things seem like tangible real-world organizations, maybe that’s a plan. It doesn’t seem like it would really take off in agricultural areas though.
Maybe you should go out in the real world once in a while too. Talk to real people instead of whinging online about discussions you aren’t capable of understanding.
Practice your SAT words, grow as a person, stop regurgitating fascist talking points… you know, that kind of stuff.
Well first you’d have to actually be correct in your assessment of the situation, while the poster is just masturbating their ego without ever even considering taking more than a cursory glance at the real world.
what exactly is the situation by your assessment then?
Many disparate bad actors are exploiting information technology to attempt building false narratives to forward their goals. Regardless of what you believe is the best option politically, if you continue to consume these false realities you’re going to do far more harm to your causes than good.
so do nothing and watch it all fall apart until someone starts dropping nukes. great approach.
You’re being deliberately disingenuous in your interpretation, but I’ll respond anyways for the benefit of others here.
What I suggest is that if you truly care deeply about these issues, you should devote quite a bit more time and effort into actually learning about it and related subjects, and seeking meaningful ways to get personally involved in a much more impactful position. Try starting here if you need a push in the right direction.
So armed…revolution? Am I reading between the lines correctly?
Did you check the link?
Honestly, how you managed to figure that learning and counterinsurgency equates to armed rebellion can’t really be explained any other way than you’re being deliberately obtuse.
Well I’m not, but it’s 240 some pages, so maybe you could help me out a bit.
Iirc it’s more like vandalize factories and act like you don’t know anything.
If you identify as a resistance person, a socialist, an anarchist, a communist, and those things seem like tangible real-world organizations, maybe that’s a plan. It doesn’t seem like it would really take off in agricultural areas though.
You don’t have to read all 240 pages to understand what it’s about. The title alone tells you what it’s about.
And really, if this is actually such a critical issue, is 240 pages truly an undue burden?
Maybe you should go out in the real world once in a while too. Talk to real people instead of whinging online about discussions you aren’t capable of understanding.
Practice your SAT words, grow as a person, stop regurgitating fascist talking points… you know, that kind of stuff.