• @goatOPM
      link
      English
      4611 months ago

      They deny the Holodomor and Uyghur genocide. As well as paint Stalin as a benevolent leader.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -1611 months ago

        I am, admittedly, not very educated on the specifics of the Uyghur genocide, though I’ve tried to read the reports covered by the news. Ultimately I think there is much we don’t know about the situation, which I think to some extent is a legitimate point of critique for the Chinese government. Holodomor on the other hand is something that is debated even in academic circles:

        While scholars are in consensus that the cause of the famine was man-made, whether the Holodomor constitutes a genocide remains in dispute.

        The quote is from Wikipedia, but also found in various formats in other sources. Now, the actual important point: Do you think their alledged stances on these questions make them evil? Because people are more complex than that, and I think the comment I linked above should tell you everything you need to know why they are also on Lemmygrad and also tell you that they are indeed not a bad person.

        • @Saledovil
          link
          English
          2111 months ago

          Taken from Wikipedia:

          In 1948, the United Nations Genocide Convention defined genocide as any of five “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.” These five acts were: killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births, and forcibly transferring children out of the group.

          So, while there may be debate on whether the Holdomor technically meets the definition of a genocide, it still constitutes mass murder.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -1011 months ago

            That is not necessarily true because it is not easy to establish intent. As far as I know there is not a clear idea on even the numbers, only estimates that have been quite far apart. I do not think there is adequate grounds to conclude that it was done with intent, nor to rule it out, hence why it is under debate.

            • @Saledovil
              link
              English
              2011 months ago

              Yeah, but man made famines still aren’t okay, even if you don’t intent to destroy a people.

              • GerryMandering
                link
                fedilink
                English
                311 months ago

                Would you consider the frequent man-made famines in ireland in the 19th century, including the very famous great famine, an example of ‘genocide’ or mass murder?

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                011 months ago

                Of course not and I think the most valuable we can learn from history is how to prevent something of the kind from happening again.

                • @goatOPM
                  link
                  English
                  411 months ago

                  That’s why we should steer away from authoritarianism, which is what these communities want.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              711 months ago

              Soviets took away all food from Ukrainian villages. They searched for hidden compartments, they probed the ground, so it wasn’t possible to hide food. They didn’t allow picking leftover grains from fields. What is the probability that the famine was unintentional? I doubt it was a big surprise that people without food starve and die.

            • @can
              link
              English
              211 months ago

              What about Canadian genocide of the indigenous? Surely you count that?

                • @can
                  link
                  English
                  311 months ago

                  It is, but so are some others that people seem to miss.

              • @PM_ME_FEET_PICS
                link
                English
                29 months ago

                Canada recognizes its multiple genocides against the First Nations. We have days dedicated to indigenous Canadians and activly trying to put indigenous voices first.

                The same can’t be said about China, Russia or the US.

        • PugJesus
          link
          fedilink
          1211 months ago

          Would someone who denied, say, the Holocaust not be a bad person because of their ‘alleged stances’?

          You want to go home, and rethink your life.

            • PugJesus
              link
              fedilink
              1011 months ago

              Ah, of course, I keep forgetting Ukrainians aren’t people to tankies.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -2
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                Uhm, I do not think you have a good understanding of what I am saying if you think I do not care deeply for the Ukrainian people both then and now. I understand that it is upsetting to debate something as horrible as what happened, but that is also why it is important to try to get the narrative right.

                • @goatOPM
                  link
                  English
                  011 months ago

                  What do you think the narrative is?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -311 months ago

                    I think it is debatable to some degree and I am not an authority on the subject. I would rather listen to someone more knowledgeable than myself talk about it.

            • @goatOPM
              link
              English
              -511 months ago

              It is not nazi apologia.

          • @Brocken40
            link
            English
            -111 months ago

            At some point you gotta live with em, you can try to tell a tankie or a Trumper the truth and they’ll nod along politly but still get drunk and spout nonsense. as long as they ain’t starting a militia or beating they wife might as well let the old dog bark

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 months ago

          It’s irrelevant if they themselves are in their hearts are evil. People in powerful positions who leverage that power to diminish the historical importance or even existence of a genocide (or, for you, merely an intentional man-made famine directed specifically at a subset of a population deemed undesirable that resulted in millions of deaths) are acting as a force of evil.

          Waving your hands and uttering the incantation of “we can’t know if they are evil” doesn’t disappear specific evil actions.

          And, good actions don’t “cancel our” the bad ones either. Volunteering at a soup kitchen doesn’t give you a free pass to beat your wife.

          Each action is evaluated within it’s own context.