• Barbarian
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Fascist is more than just authoritarian, there’s a lot of other components (fetishization of the military, an obsession with returning to the “good old days”, portraying scapegoats as simultaneously unbeatably strong and pathetically weak, etc)

    The USSR was authoritarian, but not fascist.

    EDIT: To clarify, I’m no fan of the USSR and their actions to put it mildly, but we shouldn’t dilute the word fascist by making it a synonym for authoritarianism.

    • goatOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The Soviet Union’s propaganda and culture tick all of those, though.

      But fair, I typically use authoritarian anyway.

      • MxM111@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I do not think so. There was no “return to the good old days” in USSR at all. The ideology, while was stressing the importance to defend itself, did not fetishized the military. Nationalism was also missing. And instead there was class fight, common means of production, etc. It was quite different. The only common part was the authoritarian government and the principle that the state is greater than individual.

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I lived there. No, military was not fetishized. Most of the people would not want to go and serve. The draft was something to avoid if you can.

            • goatOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              You lived there? How old are you?

                • goatOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  So you didn’t actually experience life under the soviet gulags.

                  • MxM111@kbin.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I did not claimed I am. But Soviet ideology and fascist ideology are quite different. It is not like there must be just single ideology that can do bad things.

        • goatOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Isn’t doing things for the sake of the state nationalism?

          • MxM111@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            You do not do that for the sake of state. You do that for the collective. State is just bureaucratic representation of that. In fascist Germany you would do that for the Germany and German nation specifically. In USSR you do not do that for USSR or USSR nation (there was no such thing).

          • PugJesus@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Generally that’s regarded as civic nationalism (“People are bound together by a common government”), whereas most people think of ethnic nationalism (“People are bound together by common descent or culture”) when they speak of nationalism. Though there is a strong argument to be made for the SovUnion being an extension of Russian domination over other ethnicities, just like the Russian Empire which preceded it.

        • Akagigahara@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          There was the idea of bringing the revolution to others. While mostly after Stalin, the USSR heavily engaged in combat to exert its influence. The Korean and Vietnamese Civil Wars were proxy wars in which both the US and the USSR were engaged in. Then there was the soviet invasion of Afghanistan, too.

          Their propaganda has a lot of hints of glorifying the military, sacrifice and fanaticism.

    • Akagigahara@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the only thing the USSR didn’t do when it comes to that fascism checklist is “returning to the good old days”. Other than that, Soviets fetishized the military and used scapegoats, too.

      For the scapegoats it was most often the capitalists. The propaganda they used is very similar to Nazi and Imperial Japanese propaganda.

      The USSR’s political structure was more fascist and totalitarian than authoritarian.

    • bioemerl@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      China, with it s having a system of private capital solidly co-opted and kept under the thumb of the government, far more aligns with the definition of fascism than the Soviet Union did

    • boredtortoise@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      For when a distinction is needed, I’ve seen the term pseudo-fascist being used. It’s quite fitting and works in modern contexts as well

    • glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      fetishization of the military, an obsession with returning to the “good old days”, portraying scapegoats as simultaneously unbeatably strong and pathetically weak, etc

      You’ve perfectly described Russia since WW2.