Hey all,

As discussed here, I am looking for 3 new moderators to help with this community.

Please review this post and vote for the candidate you would like to see help on this community.

In no particular order, the candidates are:

I invite you to review users post history when deciding on voting.

This thread will be open for 72 hours (until Friday June 23rd, 8PM ET) at which point voting will stop. Any votes after this time will not be counted. I will try to lock this thread after that time so people do not accidentally continue voting.

Everyone gets 1 vote, including the users being considered. The top 3 will be given mod powers of this community to help with organization of discussions and votes.

Please vote by calling the persons name. For example, if I you wanted to vote for TheDude you would reply with: TheDude

  • @KecessaEnglish
    14•1 year ago

    Nay for me too, way too controversial.

    • @goatEnglish
      -13•1 year ago

      It’s important to have diversity, especially in your moderators. Not having diversity is a death curl for any community.

      • @KecessaEnglish
        9•1 year ago

        There’s a whole lot more to being a good mod than just having a different opinions.

        A contradictarian would make for a very bad mod, but if we just base it on diversity of opinions we would believe they would be right in their place.

          • @KecessaEnglish
            7•1 year ago

            Having experience doesn’t make you a good moderator and seeing what you were moderating it’s not as if you had moderated any serious sub.

            • @goatEnglish
              -6•1 year ago

              WatchPeopleDie was a very serious sub. It had constant contact with the admins and was strictly moderated.