The article’s title covers everything. Slack simply serves as a form of social media for the office that reduces employee productivity.

  • Aurenkin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    No it isn’t.

    EDIT:

    OK to explaind on this just a bit. Slack is a Searchable Log of All Conversation and Knowledge. That’s all it is. If all you do is talk shit on there, it’s going to be a repository of shit talking and that’s not slacks fault.

    Personally, slack has saved me a countless amount of time at work. Having a technical problem? Search slack, someone probably asked about it and there’s a solution for that. If there’s no answer, asking in the right channel will usually get it answered pretty quickly.

    Especially as a remote company, slack or a tool like it is pretty indispensable for working with my team. And yes, we talk a lot of shit on there and those conversations happen in shit talking channels which means they don’t clutter the productive channels but I can still bond with my team a bit.

    I guess like any tool, it’s about how you use it. In this case though I don’t think you can blame the tool even though slack is definitely not perfect. It’s definitely far from Facebook, I honestly think you’d win some kind of record with that stretch.

    • dbilitated@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If all you do is talk shit on there, it’s going to be a repository of shit talking and that’s not slacks fault.

      perfect. yeah I love slack. people can post their FB shit in #random but the team chat is a great way to get and find answers.

    • jet@hackertalks.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve worked at companies where we had great communication policies around slack. Slack rooms were for the room topic, not for conversations.

      There was an off topic room where people could be social and shit talk.

      But basically due to our moderation rules, we really encourage people to keep channels on topic. Which made it more useful, less noisy. So it’s a social network and so far is social people use it. But the structure on top of it is determined by the company policy and the culture

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You’re really stretching the meaning of “social network” there. May as well say the postal system is a social network.

        • jet@hackertalks.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          its used by people socially, so yes, i think the post office counts as a social network… literally

        • RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Newspapers had those things where you could chat by sending in mail and having a nickname and shit.

    • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would never talk shit about anything at work on a medium that keeps a permanent record. Do people really have that hard a time staying professional?

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Of course it’s not wise to talk shit on a company platform, but Slack is hardcore about privacy.

        I’m our Slack admin. I cannot see a DM I wasn’t invited to. I cannot even see private channel names that I’m not invited to.

        The only way Slack will divulge private posts, or posts in private channels, is if the account owner contacts support and makes a case for why they need to see anything private.

        • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The danger in my mind isn’t someone without access, it’s someone with access taking screenshots and using them against you. That’s why I don’t say anything remotely shitty unless it’s on unrecorded audio.