I believe as this community is essentially a parliamentary session, any vulgar or obscene commentary should be strongly discouraged. Much like the speaker of the house, moderators should consistently remind those who break the above guideline to refrain. Repeat offenders / extreme examples should be subject to a temporary ban. Thoughts?
edit: I wonder what people think is the purpose of downvotes? Do you not want to have the discussion?

  • nyahlathotep
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I disagree. Is your point that it’s “uncivilized”? Personally, I don’t mind whatever language anyone uses in this community, unless they’re verbally attacking another user which I think should be handled by mods like any other forum.

    Edit: calls to violence and bigotry should be handled by mods too

    Edit2: Also, the word shit, one most would consider “vulgar”, is in the instance name, so it’s kinda ridiculous to want to ban such words from this community

    • loutr
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Also, the word shit, one most would consider “vulgar”, is in the instance name, so it’s kinda ridiculous to want to ban such words from this community

      Yes, I don’t care about vulgarity (hell I’m a repeat offender myself), but I agree with OP that overly obscene comments don’t have their place in this kind of “serious” community.

      • nyahlathotep
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Where do we draw the line for “overly obscene”? And is this even a problem? Can I see a link to an example?

        • loutr
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 years ago

          Where do we draw the line for “overly obscene”?

          When it gets to the point that it elicits a strong emotional response and it derails the conversation I guess? But then it would amount to trolling, which is already discouraged on this community?

          And is this even a problem?

          Don’t think so, I was speaking in the abstract, but I guess it could become one if the instance becomes more popular.

          • nyahlathotep
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 years ago

            Whose strong emotional response? If it were a rule that users should be civil to each other, or that we need to stay on topic for the post, I’d agree since those are I think more easy to delineate. But if I just use a word you don’t like, and it’s not a slur or targetting hate at you or anyone else, I don’t think it should be against the rules.

            • ProstheticBrain
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Rule number 1 for the instance is “Be respectful…” which I think covers most cases here.

              It’s possible to be respectful while using “vulgar” language and vice versa etc.

            • loutr
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              a rule that users should be civil to each other, or that we need to stay on topic for the post

              Yes that’s more or less what I meant, I’d be fine with that.