@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 8 months agoPaniki.postimg.ccimagemessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up11.31Karrow-down151
arrow-up11.26Karrow-down1imagePaniki.postimg.cc@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square149fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink26•8 months agoThe neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•8 months agoThere is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2
The neat part is that if you add the numbers together and they’re still too large to tell, you can do it again. In your example, you get 15. If you do it again, you get 6, which isn’t the best example because 15 is pretty obvious, but it works.
But how do I prove it for 6
Get 6 apples. Duh.
Prove it for 2, then un-distribute.
There is a mathematical proof that 1 + 1 = 2 so surely you could make a proof for 6 ÷ 3 = 2