• @Varyk
    link
    -28 months ago

    Not at all. I’m responding to OP, and while my comment is informative and sourced so that other people can understand it too, I do not care at all that my in-kind response turns some people off.

      • @Varyk
        link
        -28 months ago

        As scrambled as your brain is, anything could.

        • @[email protected]OP
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          my comment is informative and sourced so that other people can understand it too, I do not care at all that my in-kind response turns some people off.

          • @Varyk
            link
            -28 months ago

            And you’ve learned how to copy and paste! Big day for you.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -1
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Thanks, trusting wikipedia because it has a “source”(, as if a source meant the truth 🙄,) is super weird, and i’ll also add that a lot of sources are inaccessible anyway, such as those pointing to books. Wikipedia will hopefully(, in part because it’s always a mistake to pretend knowing “the one truth”,) be replaced one day, it’s long overdue.

      • @Varyk
        link
        2
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        The inaccessibility of many wiki sources is a very good point, thanks.

        I think Wikipedia serves its purpose as a broad strokes indicator of things that are likely significant in some way, but its limitations are as important as its content.