• Varyk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not at all. I’m responding to OP, and while my comment is informative and sourced so that other people can understand it too, I do not care at all that my in-kind response turns some people off.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        As scrambled as your brain is, anything could.

        • Daft_ish@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          my comment is informative and sourced so that other people can understand it too, I do not care at all that my in-kind response turns some people off.

          • Varyk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            And you’ve learned how to copy and paste! Big day for you.

    • soumerd_retardataire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Thanks, trusting wikipedia because it has a “source”(, as if a source meant the truth 🙄,) is super weird, and i’ll also add that a lot of sources are inaccessible anyway, such as those pointing to books. Wikipedia will hopefully(, in part because it’s always a mistake to pretend knowing “the one truth”,) be replaced one day, it’s long overdue.

      • Varyk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The inaccessibility of many wiki sources is a very good point, thanks.

        I think Wikipedia serves its purpose as a broad strokes indicator of things that are likely significant in some way, but its limitations are as important as its content.