@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 8 months agobut idk tholemmy.worldimagemessage-square49fedilinkarrow-up1985arrow-down115
arrow-up1970arrow-down1imagebut idk tholemmy.world@[email protected] to Lemmy [email protected] • 8 months agomessage-square49fedilink
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink6•8 months agoWell only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
minus-squareYAMAPIKARIYAlinkfedilink15•8 months agoYou can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
minus-squareFlying SquidMlinkfedilink3•8 months agoLet’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink3•8 months agoWhere might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilink2•edit-28 months agoTheoretically, I had underetood the opposite.
Well only if “theoretically” is followed by a statement compatible with supported theory. Too many people confuse theory with hypothesis
You can easily get away with using “Theoretically” in every situation, hypothetically speaking.
Let’s do a thought experiment on this hypothetical.
Where might hyporetically fall into this? Hyporetically speaking, for the real theothetists that might press the matter.
Theoretically, I had underetood the opposite.