• taladar
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    A lot of the body types that are considered attractive at any given time in history (which varies over time) are quite unhealthy ones as well. Just think of the anorexic supermodels of the 1990s or the corsets that restricted breathing for an hourglass figure.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I’m not arguing that.

      I’m arguing that guilt tripping anyone for being attracted to the most popular body types for no other reason than you not wanting to lose excess weight is silly and that simultainiously no one should be shamed for trying to achieve or maintain that attractive body type.

      Fat arses at their battle stations in mom’s basement can seeth all they like. Stacy likes Chad, not your sweaty blob of a body, and no, your great personality will not make up for that.

      • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Stacy likes Chad

        You’ve outed yourself as the basement dweller who spends more time with porn than with actual women.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I know it’s meme terminology, it doesn’t change the point I’m trying to make and you’re just arguing about semantics.

          I will admit that I used to look at women way out of my league and they were definitely not looking back, that’s what inspired me to get fit. Call me vain or a fashion victim or porn addict or anything else. I get the attention that I want now and your name calling means nothing to me, chunkystyles.

          • xmunk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            19
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Just FYI, using the concept of “leagues” is definitely a red flag.

            People is people.

            • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Interesting opinion, I’ve never heard that before.

              I think attractive people mostly seek relationships with other attractive people, I don’t think that’s controversial.

              How many couples do you know where one is absolutely stunning with a fit body and the other looks a roast ham? You could probably cherry pick a few but it’ll be a huge minority or you’ll find out that the ugly one is a multi millionaire or something.

              • xmunk
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                A fair number of them. Long term relationships are based on things other than appearance.

                • SoylentBlake@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yea and with those couples? The stunner with the stud from Microsoft?

                  Yea that’s called money.

                  You can say peeps is peeps and highlight outliers all you want but the generalizations are there because they’re true.

                  Look up some hoe_math on YouTube. His charts are deadpan no bullshit. Brilliant stuff.

                  • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m pretty sure there are a lot of chubsters in this thread pissed off that they’re getting some home truths because you’ve said absolutely nothing incorrect.

                • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  arrow-down
                  12
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  “a fair number”.

                  A very vague answer that requires me to research your side of argument for you. Absolutely brilliant. Are you done?

                  • xmunk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Yes, I think my point was definitively proven.

      • eek2121@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s great. It is all about Stacy’s mom, though. I hear she has it going on! 🎵