• Maddie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    117
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • AllonzeeLV@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      105
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      There were anti suffrage women’s groups.

      There were pro-Nazi Jewish people in Germany until they came for them too.

      There’s always some people within a population who just choose to side with power, even power that loathes them, in hopes they’ll become a favorite pet.

      The log cabin Republicans come to mind.

      • Ashyr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Famously, Mother Jones didn’t believe in women’s suffrage. She believed it was a distraction from class warfare.

        I tend to align more with Simone de Beauvoir who saw women as a disadvantaged class as well. I think it’s a helpful lens for how we consider gender dynamics and patriarchal structures.

        • BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Agreed. And if I can just add as to point out the fluid dynamics of modern post-constructionalism as seen through the lens of and espoused by such pioneering women as Marjorie Jacqueline Bouvier-Simpson.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The pro Nazi Jews are actually kinda funny in a horrifically dark way

        They even had a chant! “Down with us! Down with us!”

    • ArbitraryValue
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      37
      ·
      8 months ago

      Um, what about the belief that an unborn fetus has a soul? That’s a belief that tens of millions of American women sincerely hold…

      • Omnificer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        33
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Even allowing for the unproven assertion that souls exist, at no point does that soul obligate giving up bodily autonomy.

        You can’t use organs from corpses without permission, you can’t force a drunk driver to provide an organ to a kid they ran over, you can’t force a parent to donate an organ to their own child. All of these things would save “souls” but is hardly part of pro-forced birth platforms.

        And if fetuses have souls, that would surely make the Christian god the true murderer as 10 to 20% of all pregnancies end in miscarriages, but the Christian god is held to a lower moral standard than human beings by pro-forced birthers. And the governments that reject welfare programs are also held to lower moral standard for some reason, as well.

        • ArbitraryValue
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          15
          ·
          8 months ago

          You don’t need to agree with the women who oppose abortion because they believe a fetus has a soul in order to accept that these women do in fact oppose abortion because they believe a fetus has a soul. I’m not arguing that they’re right but only that they have their reasons, which they aren’t secretive about. People who wonder “how could women vote for Republicans” are ignoring the straightforward explanation that those women readily provide.

          • Omnificer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            If they can’t give a reason that’s internally consistent why should I believe them?

          • GardenVarietyAnxiety@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            18
            ·
            8 months ago

            This is the internet in 2024. You can only be “Right” or “Wrong” and that depends on which color flag the topic falls under, unfortunately.

            I’m slowly giving up on even trying to highlight any shades of grey. The goal on both sides seems to be “Shoot first, as questions later.”

            Just hoping cooler heads prevail.

      • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Religious beliefs are irrelevant outside of the personal life.

        Most people don’t even follow their religion RAW. Bunch of munchkins running bullshit homebrew rulings.

      • PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s stupid and completely unfounded in any medical science regarding when the Fetus is actually a living human being.

        Show me a woman who claims she genuinely would see a fetus in a jar and an infant newborn as equally worth saving in a crisis and I will show you a woman who swears she’d have totally been a punk rock abolitionist if she was around in the South in the antebellum years.

        Also it literally isn’t sincere belief, the Bible has exactly one thing to say about abortion, and that’s how to perform one via medicine.

        God gaveth unto the Jews, the pill.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s a belief they have only because they were told to believe it. I can’t respect that.