• @MarcoPOLOOP
    link
    -433 months ago

    Freedom of speech and the right to protest are when you get arrested for shouting at the person responsible for the death of your son.

    • athos77
      link
      fedilink
      313 months ago

      Did you even read the article you posted?

      “Our officers warned him to stop and when he did not, the man was removed from the House Galleries,” USCP said in a statement. He was arrested for crowding, obstructing or incommoding, said USCP, which added that “disrupting the Congress and demonstrating in the Congressional Buildings is illegal.”

      • @MarcoPOLOOP
        link
        -283 months ago

        Protesting your primary legislative body? Illegal.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              233 months ago

              Umm…no? lol. Freedom of speech doesn’t give the right to conduct that speech however one chooses, it gives one the ability to say or print whatever one wants without being arrested for the content of that speech. Unlike, say Russia, where you can be arrested for saying anything bad about Putin. This guy is allowed to go on the news and call Biden whatever he wants…but he’s also not free to threaten Biden’s life for instance because free speech has always had limits. Only people with limited education who are engaging in black and white thinking don’t get that.

      • @MarcoPOLOOP
        link
        -363 months ago

        Protesting your primary legislative body? Illegal.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          233 months ago

          You can protest all you want outside. Someone would get kicked out of a school board meeting for this. Free speech means the government can’t arrest you for the content of what you say or restrict political assembly.

          • @MarcoPOLOOP
            link
            -263 months ago

            Congress shall make no law […] abridging the freedom […] to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              19
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

              It is legal to peaceably petition the government for a redress of grievances.
              It is illegal to disrupt the Congress and demonstrate in the Congressional buildings.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              123 months ago

              Yet another moronic comment from you. Having the right to petition the government does not mean you can disrupt official proceedings and refuse to leave when ordered to by the police. It’s the content of speech that’s protected, you can’t go to jail for saying Biden sucks…you can go to jail for disrupting official proceedings and trespassing. You’re pretending the right to free speech gives one the right to conduct that speech however they want, and that is again…an incredibly stupid thing to suggest.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                73 months ago

                How bizarre is it that people simply choose to misinterpret plain English?

                One law says you can peacefully petition, the other says you can not be disruptive and obstructive.

                This should not be something anyone finds arguable.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              23 months ago

              Good job, but our rights don’t include standing up and screaming during official proceedings. It’s more that the government can’t arrest him for writing an op-ed or Twitter feed criticizing Biden.

              • @MarcoPOLOOP
                link
                -153 months ago

                I don’t think you understand what the first amendment actually claims

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  33 months ago

                  It does not guarantee the right to disrupt official proceedings, sorry. Like I said, go try that in a court. Walk in and start protesting about a political issue and claim you’re allowed to under the 1st amendment. This isn’t exactly the first time someone has tried that btw.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      133 months ago

      Try going in a courthouse and yelling at someone during a hearing.

      Hell, try going in a Post Office and yelling at someone.

      • @MarcoPOLOOP
        link
        -173 months ago

        The Post Office is not a political body

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          103 months ago

          I used that example because they are also federal property as opposed to private property. It seems you missed the point, though. Free speech doesn’t mean you can create a public disturbance.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              3
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              The entire story and event are Republican media stunts. Yes, the guy lost his son and is upset. But blaming Biden for it (like OP did - “his fault”) is about like what they did with Clinton and Benghazi. Strangely it comes up often on Lemmy, “I’m so leftist that I repeat and amplify exactly what Republicans say!”

    • queermunist she/her
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      Nah, his son was responsible for his own death. I won’t say he deserved to die but I will say I dgaf about dead marines.