• xmunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    Pretty much - Biden is doing better than any other president but we need a much more aggressive climate action change. Every other president has gotten an F on climate change. Biden eeked out a C- that’s better but not good.

    • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Well… if the United States as a whole is hell-bent on climate destruction and in total denial that the whole thing is even a priority in the first place, and bringing Biden into the equation suddenly brought the result output up to a C-, what does that mean Biden’s contribution to the average is?

      I’m not trying to say to take a break on forward progress or give him any kind of undeserved credit. But it seems very weird to pick out the one guy out of the whole in-power class who produced a detectable step forward, and then try to say that because the step wasn’t big enough that means he’s a big problem.

      • xmunk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You misunderstand, I’m not picking on the one guy. I protested Bush and Obama’s mishandling of climate change and would have done the same for Trump and Biden if I was still in the states. Biden is the best of those four but still not good enough - and there are politicians he could tap to make more effective changes.

        • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          You misunderstand, I’m not picking on the one guy.

          Just saying he sucks? Because he only made 40% progress with almost the entire rest of the system rigged against him?

          I mean, if you want to walk it back to “he made some progress but it’s very small in comparison to the scale of the problem and we need more,” then like I say, I can definitely agree with that statement. But I’m not feeling like I misunderstood anything of what you said initially. I just think it wasn’t at all the same as these more recent more reasonable statements.

          • xmunk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Ooh, I’m not that dude, my first comment in this thread was the third one - I think that was the source of confusion.

            • mozz@mbin.grits.devOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              Ooooh

              Makes perfect sense. I committed a rookie mistake. Almost everything you actually said, I more or less agree with. (Although, the infrastructure bill has the largest investment in public transit in America’s history; it just was in there as opposed to the climate bill.) But yeah most of my real irritation was directed at the first guy.