• AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    SEOUL, Nov 30 (Reuters) - About 200 South Korean farmers who breed and raise dogs for human consumption held a rally on Thursday near the presidential office in the capital Seoul, demanding the government scrap a plan to ban the controversial centuries-old practice.

    Dozens of farmers, who had tried to drive into the street in front of the presidential office by truck with dogs in cages that they intended to release at the scene, were turned away by the police who inspected the cargo covered with blankets.

    The ruling party of President Yoon Suk Yeol has introduced a bill to ban the breeding and sale of dogs for consumption and offer financial compensation for those in the industry forced to shutter their business within a three-year grace period.

    The farmers scuffled with police who outnumbered them and set up barricades to stop them from crossing the street to move closer to the presidential office.

    The farmers have accused First Lady Kim, a vocal critic of dog meat consumption, of exercising what they call improper pressure on the government and the ruling party to bring in the ban.

    “The First Lady has spoken out about this issue with keen interest, and both in the country and abroad there is support and consensus, as well as from the opposition party,” the presidential office said.


    The original article contains 464 words, the summary contains 222 words. Saved 52%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

      • kvasir476@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that’s what I don’t understand. I don’t really see any moral distinction between eating dogs/cats/horses vs pigs/cows/chickens. It seems like the only logically consistent positions are to ban it all or allow it all; picking and choosing doesn’t make much sense.

        • Sanctus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Its the vacinity of relationships people perceive. Same reason why in Rain World your main source of food as the player is something that is hard to identify with (a batfly). People are more offended by others eating dogs because most people perceive them as closer to us than other animals. It isn’t true in the slightest, but I hope this brought some understanding. Its all perception and misunderstanding. We eat living beings when other living beings literally make things made to eat (fruits). Its a mutually beneficial trade, they get their seeds spread and we get a lil’ treat.

        • goatOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          22
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s because dogs aren’t prey animals.

    • xep@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So you think that some farmers protesting the loss of their livelihood is as unacceptable as a sanctioned autocracy that constantly fires missiles towards their neighbours?

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The mistake youre making is assuming any dog breed is being used as food (it isnt).

      Similar to cow breeds, there are cow breeds that for millenia were not used for food (go look up the history of Wagyu), but youre okay with eating a cow breed that wasnt considered food till the 1800s.