House Speaker Mike Johnson said Saturday he believes Republicans have the votes to launch a formal impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

“I believe we will,” Johnson told Fox News of a GOP-led impeachment inquiry. “I suspect no Democrats will assist in this effort, but they should.”

Johnson added Republicans “have a duty to do this” and “we cannot stop the process.”

Republican leadership and key GOP committee chairs on Friday made the case for why they believe an inquiry vote is necessary, arguing it would strengthen their legal standing in court and accusing the White House of “stonewalling” their probe into the president and his son’s foreign business dealings – a claim the White House has forcefully rebutted.

Johnson, appearing alongside House GOP conference chair Elise Stefanik, claimed the inquiry wouldn’t be used as a partisan political tool.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    154
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    He may or may not have the votes, but he certainly doesn’t have the evidence. However, that no longer seems relevant for Republicans.

    They believe in the rule of law, just like they believe in Jesus. More of a mascot than a coach.

  • oDDmON@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Another pandering to the base waste of time and taxpayer money.

    Yet they keep getting elected.

    • Riccosuave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem with morons is they enjoy being pandered to. When a large portion of the voting electorate possesses less critical thinking skills than the average elementary school child, you can see how pandering to what they perceive to be their “in-group” is THE MOST effective strategy. Until education, gerrymandering, and the problems with the electoral college are addressed in this country we will always be in a perpetual position of potential minority rule by the stupid, lowest common denominator of the voting public.

      • EatYouWell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        I really believe you should at least have to take a pop quiz on your party’s current platform before you’re allowed to vote.

          • oDDmON@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mmm…maybe to highlight a plank?

            Like when TX added the shitcanning of teaching critical thinking, because it might abrogate parental authority (no shit).

    • ripcord@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I generally agree, although this is exactly what commenters on conservative subs were saying 3 years ago. Well, they were complaining about immigration and stuff and not teachers and doctors, but still.

      • hansl@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        Democrats didn’t wait three years to provide evidence in the Trunp impeachment. The Ukraine call thing took less than four months to provide evidence.

      • whofearsthenight@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, however in this case, actual objective reality seems to support the idea that there is no evidence for a Biden impeachment instead of the made up alternate reality those conservatives were living in.

  • blazera@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I see they still dont have a single accusation for Joe. Hunter is not an elected official.

  • silverbax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Every day we see another mass shooting in the US, and this is what these idiots are working on.

    • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not American, but have had a great interest in Malcolm Gladwell’s Revisionist History podcast and his dive into America’s past and current issues with gun violence. In the last episode I listened to, he interviewed several trauma surgeons, and they said they would likely not see a dent in gunshot victims arriving to trauma centres if mass shootings were to end tomorrow.

      That, and the gun violence epidemic has been masked by improvements to trauma care. Essentially, gunshot wound treatment has improved so much that the reduction in murder rate can be significantly attributed to that. If victims survive, the crime is classified as aggravated assault and separate stats aren’t even kept by PDs for the number of people shot versus other weapons. So, there’s actually very poor to no available information on the prevalence of gun violence if the people who were shot survive.

      • SameOldInternet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do realize that mass shootings are categorized on how many are shot and not how many dies. Let’s not also get into the fact that gun violence is still gun violence regardless of the charge. You need to find a new podcast.

        • OminousOrange@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Calm down. I agree with you, I’m just saying mass shootings are only a small part of the gun violence issue, and would add that it’s unlikely that government intervention would do much to impact overall instances of bullet contact, as many of the firearms are already unlawfully obtained in the first place.

  • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good to see Republicans are working on the important things this country really need first…

  • Nougat@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Elise and I both served on the impeachment defense team of Donald Trump twice, when the Democrats used it for brazen partisan political purposes. We decried that use of it. This is very different,” Johnson said.

    Oh ffs.

    • chaogomu@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      To be fair, it is very different. Trump committed some actual crimes. Serious crimes.

      Republicans looked the other way, and for good measure plugged their ears while screaming nonsense like a bunch of toddlers who didn’t want to hear that it was time for bed.

  • ares35@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “claimed the inquiry wouldn’t be used as a partisan political tool”

    lol… not ‘used as’ one… it is one.

  • Silverseren@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How has the White House been stonewalling anything? They’ve been staying out of it entirely, as has the DOJ seemingly. It’s just that y’all conservatives have been failing at proving anything whatsoever about Hunter and have just been making yourselves look like idiots.

    • deft@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because voting genuinely matters.

      They tried to make it not matter but it really really matters. Dems need the voters