• DominusOfMegadeus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    256
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s amazing how little leverage they have when you stop using their products.

    • ForgotAboutDre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      89
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      More than you think. They are also actively seeking ways to make that leverage effect more people.

      They are defining web standards. They control chrome and chromium. So all of the alternative browsers that aren’t safari and Firefox are using Google’s web engine. Even Firefox and safari are beholden to Google as they fund both these web browsers through their default search deals.

      Google after many failed messaging apps has taken on RCS messaging. They provide most of the supporting infrastructure through their Jibe servers. They don’t allow anyone but themselves and Samsung to make an RCS app on android. They also had a campaign to pressure apple to use RCS. It’s likely apple’s RCS will be following Google’s Jibe service closely, as they’ve already said their will work with Google on this. Google successfully got most RCS messages going through their servers, with apple on board with RCS itll see most SMS messages defaulting to RCS and most of those going through Google.

      They also have deep hooks into education market with their OneDrive/Google docs products and Chromebooks.

      Most privacy focused android alternatives recommend Google hardware.

        • ReveredOxygen
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s the most common way to contact people in the US

          • Eximius@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I see. In Europe, everyone’s on Whatsapp, Telegram or even Signal, nobody uses sms :)

            • pirat@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’ll call that an incorrect and generalizing statement. The adaptation of these apps differs a lot from country to country, and SMS is definitely not dead yet. Beside people still texting, it’s also being used for verification codes, order confirmations, postal tracking notices, scamming, phishing and so much more!

              • effward@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Most of my personal communication goes through Signal, but I still get a ton of SMS messages.

                • 25% spam
                • 40% scams
                • 30% one time passwords for shitty sites/apps that don’t support better 2FA options
                • 5% iPhone users who refuse to install Signal

                Real useful stuff…

        • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wish I could.

          I’ve tried for years to get people over to things like XMPP, which is cross platform since, well, forever.

          No dice.

      • Clegko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        They are defining web standards. They control chrome and chromium. So all of the alternative browsers that aren’t safari and Firefox are using Google’s web engine. Even Firefox and safari are beholden to Google as they fund both these web browsers through their default search deals.

        🎶 I think I’ve seen this film before… 🎶

      • casmael@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Meh I think they might be overestimating their market position if that’s the strategy

        • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I think they’re in a better position than Microsoft when they tried to make ActiveX and Silverlight a thing. They own the two most visited websites. On top of that, they own the most used web browser and the most used operating system (judged by web use).

          • sadreality@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Their behavior is that of a monopolist.

            However, they are not selling food or shelter. There ways to defeat their OS, is custom Roms for now, etc.

            Other solutions will need to be developed but it seems we have some products being worked on as we speak but not mainstream ready.

            It don’t be easy fight but if people vote with their money and feet, we customer should win in the end. That is unless daddy Sam boxes us in, and mega corps deff lobbying for that too.

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    130
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox is loving every week of this as they head towards launch. Market share is guaranteed to improve.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I’ve seen people who were hard chrome users start to change their tune about it. A few even changed over to Firefox. Now I understand that my sample size is people I know, but even my wife asked me “how can I stop the youtube ads stuff” after noticing that I don’t have to deal with that bullshit… and she’s not tech literate at all.

        • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The issue is that most people will just end at “well I guess I can’t block ads anymore”.

          • ThePrivacyPolicy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yep. Just like everyone that was going to leave Netflix when they axed account sharing, but then just made their own accounts and went on with life. I’d see a similar thing playing out here for all but the more technical users who may start switching.

            • effward@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hey, if it makes you feel any better, Netflix started blocking me from sharing an account with my parents, and we cancelled the account and didn’t make any new ones.

              Although, if they still had disc deliveries, my parents would probably have kept the account.

      • CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not really about giving a shit, but when you’re used to no ads, then seeing ads is an inconvenience. And that’s usually even more potent than people giving a shit or not

      • SHOW_ME_YOUR_ASSHOLE@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I switched to FF on mobile a few months back and I finally switched to FF on desktop earlier today.

        I had been a chrome user for maybe 15 or 20 years? I don’t actually remember when chrome came out but I started using it shortly after.

    • HaggierRapscallier@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The problem is Firefox is not really an independant organisation; (it’s not independant from Google).

  • LazaroFilm@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    My 5 years old decided to switch to Firefox after I told him google chrome will not block ads on YouTube anymore.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      That’s the iq it takes yeah. :)

      Not saying anything bad about your son, hopefully you understand what I mean.

      • Aasikki@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ll never understand why so many people seem to be afraid of change. To me change is exciting, something new to explore, a chance to learn something new.

        • krakenx@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It will happen as you get older. You might not even realize it, and it will start with disliking changes that are objectively bad. But soon it will be changes that are neutral, and eventually changes that are positive but not very positive.

  • Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Firefox isn’t an “alternative browser.”

    I didn’t think Google would play the evil card, but don’t trust the ad blocking abilities of software made by an advertising company, I guess.

    • kubica@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      What do you mean by not an alternative browser?
      Are you trying to say something about the word choice or…?
      Chrome is an alternative browser to Firefox too.

      • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        yes, i think he is speaking about the word itself. it is terrible that it is gaining negative connotation… like when people say bullshit like “alternative facts” or “alternative medicine” and the word itself slowly starts to look slightly suspicious just because it is used by morons.

    • barsoap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Of course it’s the alternative. Has always been, even before it was called Firefox: Netscape Navigator is the alternative to Mosaic. Fun fact: Internet Explorer was a fork of Mosaic. All of Chrome, Edge and Safari are descendants of KHTML.

  • SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is this even legal? So now suddenly every chromium extension has to go through a play store style review? How is Google entitled to do this on their competitor’s browsers?

    • b3nj@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They can do it if a competitor has forked Chromium but not bothered to provide their own addon store. For example, Edge supports its own store plus Google, Vivaldi only supports Google

  • Dizzirron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not hard to believe these rumors of super low morale within the industry are true.

  • HenriVolney
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    How is it still a problem for anyone? I haven’t used Google in years and I am unexpectedly still alive

    • Final Remix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We have prescribed terminals in our classrooms that are wiped between classes and only have chrome included. It’s a fuckin’ pain to have to load uBlock in each class in each section every day, because for some reason, our uni’s IT department only supports chrome.

      • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Are you able to access anything like USB drives? There are portable versions of Firefox you can carry around with you.

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I have ‘em, but links still default to fuckin’ chrome, which makes “impromptu” PowerPoint supplements awkward.

          • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There are also portable Version of libre office for Windows, which you can configure to open in Firefox.

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nah, they went with the route of least resistence. Gotta remember, they’re dealing with thousands of students (college aged kids now just don’t use computers the same way and don’t want to learn how to, at large) and faculty (people who may be doing this job for decades and refuse to learn computers beyond the minimal requirement).

          • Evkob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            This reminds me of years ago when I was trying to get my grandma off of Internet Explorer.

            The only thing that worked in the end was adding a shortcut to the desktop and changing its icon to IE’s. For a lot of younger people, or older folk who resisted computers until the 2010s, Chrome is the internet, the same way my grandma thought IE was the internet.

      • HenriVolney
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well let’s say they shouldn’t for many reasons, the most obvious being Google’s systematic push at harvesting every last data about your life. In my country, many schools ban chrome from their devices for this very reason

  • Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I switched to FireFox slightly before all this Adblock-Drama came up. Simply because i realised Chrome was getting ridiculously slow ._.

  • Swarfega@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    What happened to the ad blocker detection thing a month ago. Did Google remove it or does uBlock Origin have a permanent workaround now rather than needing to clear cache and reload?

    • redcalcium@lemmy.institute
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s still an ongoing war, but with Manifest V3, Google will have an advantage over adblockers because they will be in full control over the frequency of extension updates, how many ad blocking rulesets they’ll allow, and perhaps when no one is looking, prevents those rulesets from targeting their own domains. The latter is the nuclear option that’ll instantly piss off the whole tech world if implemented now, but perhaps slow boiled frogs won’t notice it once the heat is high enough.

      • Tygr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Setting up a huge privacy lawsuit by trying to force us to allow these horrendous advertising tracking scripts.

    • micka190@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      They regularly try to add things to break it, and uBlock’s devs update it as fast as possible. They’ll probably slow down on these breaking changes as it falls out of the spotlight and people slowly forget about it.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m wondering if Chromebooks can run Firefox? I’m guessing not. I know you can install adblockers on them. Not after mid-2024, I guess.

    It really sucks that an affordable notebook computer means getting locked into an advertising system. You can get a Chromebook for under $100 and they have a very, very easy-to-use OS. They’re great for poor people and elderly people.

    So much for putting an adblocker on Grandma’s computer now.

    • 14th_cylon@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      1 year ago

      you can have refurbished thinkpad for the same price and you don’t have to deal with some chrome-crap.

      honestly, the fact that people have to be reminded there are alternatives to chrome is the most mindblowing fact from the article.

    • WHYAREWEALLCAPS@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 year ago

      You can run the android version or use the Linux VM. Neither are great but are workable. Unless they’ve changed it recently, you can also dual boot them and run Linux off an external drive.

      I’d honestly say skip the Chromebook, get an older used laptop that is known to be fully supported by Linux, install a lightweight distro, and off you go if all Grandma needs is a web browser. Older used laptops are usually far better powered than a cheap Chromebook for the same price anyways. Plus it fights e-waste.

      A further option is to do adblocking at the router or through the computer’s own networking system or something like a Pihole. These all come with their own pros and cons.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’d honestly say skip the Chromebook

        It’s not always an option. For example, every computer in my house runs normal desktop GNU, except that I was forced to buy a Chromebook because my university’s proctoring software only supported that, MacOS, or Windows.

          • Clegko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Lots of those fucking proctoring softwares detect when you’re in a VM and refuse to run. 🙄

              • Clegko@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                There are but sometimes you want shit to just work. Annoyingly, a real windows computer is the easiest sometimes.

                • Zealousideal_Fox900@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yeah I remember our school stuck out like a massive sore thumb and ran Linux on its computers until the very, very fucking end. The Dept. Education eventually threatened budget cuts that would kill the school. They eventually folded but to really make it hard for the dept. ed they said that all the laptops that were already running linux could and would continue to run linux. The reason why is because of some monitoring program the dept. ed wanted to put on that linux wouldn’t run.

    • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      If all you need is a cheap laptop, there’s thousands of deals on refurbished or used ones. You don’t need this year’s model to browse the web and send email.

      Throw Ubuntu or something on it and you can go even cheaper hardware wise.

    • Corgana@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      If she’d allow you, you could always put a little pihole ($10-20) on her network (with the bare minimum lists so that it doesn’t break things too often). Wouldn’t change anything about her computer.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Just started running PiHole with a couple lists (default + more restrictions) and have seen zero negative effects so far. Surprising really.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sure, but do you think Grandma who spent $100 on a Chromebook at Walmart is going to be able to figure out Linux even if their grandson knows how to install it? Chrome OS is the push-here-dummy of OSes. You really can’t get much simpler. This is dangling a carrot in front of them so they’ll be forced to look at endless advertising.

        • Keith@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’s fair enough although I’d argue some desktop environments and Linux distributions are usable very easily. Remember that people like grandma are using “the operating system as a bootloader for the browser” and if they can open Chrome or Firefox they’re good.

          That being said when writing my response I admittedly had you in mind as the user who simply wanted to save money.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well I do want to save money, but I’m not interested in a Chromebook for myself. My mother-in-law swears by hers though.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        My mother-in-law, who has a Chromebook, doesn’t want a tablet because she wants a reliable keyboard. That makes sense to me.

        Also, lots of school systems have opted to give their students Chromebooks and turning educational platforms into advertising platforms is criminal. Currently, my daughter’s school Chromebook (thankfully she returns it in a few weeks) is ad-free unless she goes to a third party website. How long is that going to last?

        “Just get a Linux tablet” is not a universal solution. Nor is all of these people saying people should just get older refurbished or used notebooks instead. That will work for some people, sure, but it will not work for all people. Not for school systems and not for people who already own Chromebooks and can’t handle a Linux learning curve.

        That said, according to others, you can install FF on them through their Android compatibility, but how long will Google allow that?

        I’m sorry, but “just switch to X” is really not a solution for a lot of people. And they don’t deserve this from companies like Google.

        • Final Remix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s not all about advertising. It’s just that Chromebooks are practically disposable and locked down enough to break most LMS, and prevent idiots from breaking / installing stuff. And Netbooks have fallen out of vogue.

  • C126
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Any article summary?

    • Vent@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Google is disallowing “remote code” in extensions and classifying blocklists (the lists of urls that ad blockers use to know what to block, which are just text files hosted on remote servers like github) as remote code. As a result, any blocklist updates will need to go through the extension review process, which typically takes anywhere from a few hours to a few weeks.

      Google often updates YouTube’s ad delivery on a daily basis. Blocklists must also update as frequently to keep ads blocked on YT. If Google requires that blocklists go through the review process, they can drag their feet and essentially render the ad blockers useless even if they have to allow them to stay in the extension store.