• prole
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You know what was also risky?

    Ruling against Roe. Ruling that a company can refuse service to a theoretical gay customer because they’re gay. Ruling that affirmative action is unconstitutional. Ruling against Biden’s student loan forgiveness.

    I would also say things like blatantly flaunting your billionaire handlers is pretty risky as well, and literally nothing came of that.

    This isn’t exactly a risk-adverse SCOTUS.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you’re saying there is only one possible way they will rule? Again, I don’t claim to predict the future.

      • prole
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not predicting the future, Jesus Christ dude where have I ever claimed to know what they’re going to do?? Right now, it could go either way. But you seem to have no interest in even entertaining the thought that they might rule in favor of Trump, and you’re literally saying that there is no value in speculating. Fuck that.

        The ultimate conclusion of your thought process here is that it’s never any use in speculating and making plans based on that speculation, unless you know for sure what the outcome is going to be. Do you not see how absurd that is? Of course I don’t know what they are going to do, but I can speculate based on past/recent behaviors. I can even attach estimated probabilities to those outcomes (how accurate they may be is a different discussion).

        This whole, “we don’t know for sure how they will rule, so until then we will do nothing and will make plans for neither outcome,” shit is silly. Nobody thinks like that in real life. Not successful politicians at least.

        This is what politics is. People try to predict what the other side may or may not do given the current circumstances and then make plans (and backup plans, and backups of backup plans, etc.) to react once those decisions are made.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m pretty sure this all started because I speculated.

          Also, you seem to be the one “coming in real hot” right now based on that first paragraph.

          Also:

          This whole, “we don’t know for sure how they will rule, so until then we will do nothing and will make plans for neither outcome,” shit is silly.

          I never said anything about doing nothing, so I agree. That is silly. I’m just not sure why you’re telling me it’s silly.

          • prole
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            OK, bud.

            Anyway, there is a very real chance that they will rule in favor of Trump and it is important to plan for that possibility. I think the recent behavior of this specific court has shown time and time again that they simply Do. Not. Care.

            I’m not sure why you even took issue with what I was saying in the first place other than to just pick a fight. I never claimed to know the future, that entire thing was just a strawman. Starting to wonder if any of this is good faith.

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m not sure why you even took issue with what I was saying in the first place other than to just pick a fight.

              I’m afraid you have the order of things wrong. This started when you took issue with what I had said. I was not talking to you when you initially replied to me.

              So if anything, this is a question you should be asking yourself.

              • prole
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That’s not even fucking true dude, your first comment in this particular thread was a reply to mine taking issue with what I said.

                How many sockpuppet accounts do you have at this point? I don’t believe, for a moment, that there is anyone but you and I that cares enough about the comments this deep in an already meaningless argument to even bother reading, let alone upvoting/downvoting this far into this nonsense thread. I see you everywhere on this site, and now I think I have an idea as to why/how.

                Good luck with all that, I guess. Everyone needs a hobby.

                  • prole
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Is this your job?

                    And yeah I already told you. Nobody but you is downvoting comments this far deep in such a banal and pointless thread from several days ago, and my comments aren’t at 0, they’re lower than that.

                  • prole
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Been some time since I’ve used lemmy on a web browser, but unless I’m mistaken, if you were logged into your FlyingSquid account when this screenshot was taken, the username would be highlighted in some way.

                    This literally looks like a screenshot of you using a sockpuppet account lol