• 0x4E4F
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    How different? They still use light for drum polarization, right?

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes but LEDs are smaller and more powerful than a laser assembly so the whole process is faster.

      In the time it takes to energise the drum with a laser, the LED panel can do all 4 inks.

      • 0x4E4F
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Cool, that seems like a new take on things 👍.

      • 0x4E4F
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In contrast to LED printers, laser printers require combinations of rotating mirrors and lenses that must remain in alignment throughout their use. The LED print head has no moving parts, and the individual assemblies tend to be more compact.

        Yeah, thought as much. LEDs are cheaper than lasers, so stack a bunch of them in a line, polarise the drum, bam, you have an image.

        Basically, this is the only advantage. And laser heads break very very rarely. You litelarly have to drop the printer from a considerable height in order to break the laser head mechanism.

        But, I can see the appeal. Laser heads and mechanisms are more expensive to manufacture.