• rustyriffs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    It would be cool to see a video breakdown of how this design is supposed to work. How anyone could hit anything like that seems impossible. Lol

    • giggling_engine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Looks rather simple, the gun itself doesn’t change shape, only the cover. Looks like there’s a small periscope for aiming.

      • andrew_bidlaw
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It took a long time imagining it, but then I’m out of ideas why it’s not monolithic. Having two eyesights and running with a weird angled gun aren’t as a problem as servicing that thing and rely on it. But just like OP I would’ve seen a vif of how and why it’s that way.

  • huskypenguin
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Doesn’t that thing shoot a large caliber? The kick would be awful in that position.

    • FireTower@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It shoots 30-06 which is a .30 caliber bullet. But it is a larger cartridge then most infantry rifles today. I think the recoil on the shooter wouldn’t be too bad, but it’d have a lot of muzzle climb.

  • CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I can guess that these are quite inaccurate, but with the massively increased protection it offers in trench warfare, I’ve always wondered why remote controlled weapons or this kind of foldable weapon with a periscope have seemingly completely disappeared?

    I would imagine that mounting a machine gun on a tripod and operating it from Dow in the trench would be both simple, effective, and far safer than exposing yourself over the top.