• AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Meta said in a statement that privacy was top of mind when designing the glasses. “We know if we’re going to normalize smart glasses in everyday life, privacy has to come first and be integrated into everything we do,” the company said.

    Ha.

    I don’t think Meta has the same idea of privacy than the people do. I mean, Meta having all the data hidden in their servers, being fed to AI and given to advertisement algorithms is privacy when the data is “anonymized” and held onto securely. Right?

  • southsamurai
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s an easy fix. You see someone wearing them, you smash them. If it happens enough, people won’t want them.

    • Immersive_Matthew
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Glasses like these, plus MR headsets are going to merge into a very powerful set of glasses with AI that will end up replacing smartphones in the next decade as they really will offer more value.

      • Meowoem
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m not convinced, I need glasses and hate wearing them plus contacts are horrible but hugely popular because people think glasses are worse.

        I think there are plenty of uses for HUD but they’re being greedy by trying to corner a consumer market that doesn’t exist when they should be trying to solve their way into niche markets which can popularise the tech and develop uses for it.

        There’s almost nothing that I use a smart phone for which glasses would be better, I don’t need object labelling because I rarely come across an object I don’t recognise, I don’t need instant notification of messages or alerts. Maybe gen alpha will like having subway surfer playing at all times but I don’t really think so.

        I think AI voice control and natural language though text input will remove even more of the need for it and taskable automation will help reduce that even more by removing jobs that need labelling assistance.

        Wearing body cameras will likely become standard though whether we like it or not, which I assume most people won’t but will go along with for reasons of personal protection against slander and duplicitous editing.

  • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think that this catches on. However, the second this is included with lenses that act as transparent screens for AR stuff, it’ll be flying off the shelves. No, not the very first model, not the second probably, but the one made by a large corporation that actually does it well.

    Though tbh just the lenses / screens would do it, camera is just extra. So I actually think first they will get the lenses done and camera stuff ia added later when the rest is already commonly used.

    • taladar
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      How are you supposed to do AR without the camera? The computer has to know the environment it is supposed to augment. Even though if you mean recording doesn’t have to be part of the camera I would agree.

      • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        I was more thinking of it being like a heads up display you know? It wouldn’t be AR at that point sure, just a screen.

        • taladar
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t really see a screen with a transparent background that is constantly in front of your face catching on unless it is used for AR.

          • AnonStoleMyPants@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I disagree, I’d get one if I could use it as a second monitor! Though if you can’t navigate in the “screen”, then it could be difficult. But yeah AR definitely would make things muuuch more interesting.

  • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    More alarmist bill crap. Just going to make sure the public never wants to hear another privacy article again.

    Metas glasses aren’t even particularly novel. They certainly ain’t the end of privacy.

  • JokeDeity@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    When the idiotic masses and paid influencers hop on board like they always do it will spur a bunch of companies to make similar and maybe one of them will be worth buying.