• dream_weasel
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    So… To be clear, your argument here is that choosing the specific words of the savior which are canonized in the holy book (which may or may not be perfect, whatever) as exemplar behavior is invalid because…

    *reads back*

    “The Bible says a lot of things” so we shouldn’t just focus on those?

    So like, there’s no reason to judge for not loving your neighbor, because the Bible also says you gotta do gay hating and there just aren’t enough hours in the day to get them all done? What the fuck lol.

    Or alternatively you’re saying that “it says a lot of things” like no reasonable person would assume only good things are part of Christianity because it says all those bad things? Congratulations you’ve reached the argument for disregarding the Bible and taken steps 2-7 of becoming atheist.

    Your argument sort of works if you want to discredit the “bad stuff”, but when applied to core tenets of the faith to make Christians not look bad for not doing them it looks pretty stupid yo.

      • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Using a bad faith book full of hypocrisies is not a valid way to judge others.

        It’s exactly the right way to judge those who use the same method of judgement. Calling LGBTQ+ people evil because the book says so? You best be following that book to the letter, or we’re going to hit you with it.

      • dream_weasel
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        If they believe it to be absolute truth, yes it is. That’s how arguments work. Both sides don’t need to believe an argument for it to be wrong, you need only show it isn’t self consistent.