• athos77
    link
    fedilink
    41
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The hard drive IBM shipped in 1956:

    • Stored five megabytes
    • Cost $11,000 per megabyte *
    • Was 60 inches long x 68 inches high x 29 inches deep
    • Weighed about one ton

    * about $121,819.66 per mb in today’s money.

    • @kboy101222
      link
      English
      124 months ago

      And nowadays you can get a 2TB SSD that fits in your pocket and costs like $150.

      Can someone do the math on how much cheaper and smaller memory is now?

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        64 months ago

        Hell, you can get a 1tb microSD card for around that same price. Crazy. Be careful not to accidentally inhale it, lol

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54 months ago

        It’s 0,000075 USD per mb now with your example, which is about 146 666 666 times cheaper.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          64 months ago

          To add a bit of perspective, the 4tb m.2 ssd that I just bought for around $300USD would fill a cube that is a bit over a football field in length, width, and height.

          It would cost about $44 billion before inflation is factored in, or $487 billion with inflation included.

          It would also use an insane amount of electricity, be a ton slower, and likely generate an enormous amount of heat.

          Hoping I did the math correctly. Haven’t had coffee.

          • Redjard
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Might be faster if all drives are connected in parallel

  • PugJesusM
    link
    fedilink
    214 months ago

    “Think, Bob - in 70 or so years, maybe we’ll have cut this down to HALF the size!”

    • Uglyhead
      link
      fedilink
      English
      10
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Or, ‘there will be warehouses full of these one day; just think, a whole One —Hundred—Megabyte!’ Mind blown

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      64 months ago

      I wonder if that concept would have even been present yet. In 1956 they had never seen a technology cycle like doubling of capacities or capabilities like this. Computers were just things that took up entire rooms. Everybody thought the technology was only interesting for massive enterprise or universities.

      I don’t think they even had 8-track at this point? Perhaps some cars had record players, so they had indeed seen some technology go from living room size to car size.

  • guyrocket
    link
    fedilink
    184 months ago

    I really think it is amazing that now we can put exponentially more data than this in a pocket. And that most humans now carry pocket computers that can access astounding amounts of information.

    The information age really is amazing.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      154 months ago

      And yet somehow there are still flat earthers and the like carrying around tons of data that proves them wrong but they just don’t care.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      34 months ago

      I wonder how big a space we’d need to accommodate for just 100 gigs, using the footprint of this 5MB drive?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    114 months ago

    The first two hardrives I had experience were not that big, but still required to people to get into the cabinet. A Fujitsu Eagle and a CDC I can’t remember which model that had 5MB fixed and 5MB removable.

    • SjmarfOP
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      My bad; I’ve edited the title. Thanks!

  • @JadenSmith
    link
    English
    -24 months ago

    The bald person at the bottom’s head looks like a penis.