• MajorHavoc@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I could see the trouble with a single game being that a game breaking bug discovered in November could bankrupt the company by missing Christmas release, or releasing a broken product.

      A company with a few other games in the pipeline has a chance to advertise and release one of the others, which might be missing a planned level, but not actually be broken.

      • The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        What I really wish is for some way for game developers to gain a cut of the secondary market* so that they weren’t so financially dependent on a treadmill of output. Developers should have a vested interest to continue to support and work on their games for as long as there’s an active fanbase. Access to the secondary market (i.e. a cut of used game sales) would enable that while also supporting consumer ownership rights. The fact that I have hundreds of dollars (more? no idea) of illiquid assets in the form of digital-only games is an undue burden on the consumer. /rant

        *not through expensive DLCs, subscriptions, or the way Skyrim did it, preferably

      • sugar_in_your_tea
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I doubt Square Enix is at risk of bankruptcy. If Larian can do it, Square Enix won’t have issues.