• Punkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    234
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I married my first wife when she was 18 and I was 20. We went through a lot of hardship. It should not have worked out: we were both poor, from broken homes, in an LDR from different worlds. She was the popular girl, I was a shy and awkward nerd. When we got married, we had only been in one another’s presence for a few weeks total. I went into the marriage not expecting a path or plan, as my parents were toxic which ended with my mother’s suicide, and my mother in law had been married 4 times before she became single for the last time. None of us had healthy marriages to draw from. At our wedding, her relatives even said, “I give it two years, tops.” We were desperately poor, and struggled most of our marriage with health and money issues.

    But we made it work for 25 years. We’d still be married, but she passed away ten years ago. We became “foxhole buddies,” us against the world.

    • faintwhenfree@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      This, all marriages are supposed to be this, us vs the world, while I get the argument you don’t know who you really want when you are 20, I’ve also seen cases like yours, as long as both people figure out us vs the world, I think the marriage will last. So when people say 25 and after it makes sense, I’ve also seen cases where people never understand in their life this us vs them mentality, and are never happy and I always wonder the question how much age plays a role in people understand what marriage is supposed to be?

      Anyway thanks for your take my man, my condolences, I wish you all the best.

    • neidu2@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I have neither insight nor retorts to offer, I just wanted to congratulate you on 25 years. Hell, even 5 years with someone who’d dig in with you is worthy of praise in this world. I’m glad you found your foxhole buddy, and I wish you all the best.

  • UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    122
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I swear some people go out of their way to judge others for the most ridiculous things. Maybe try asking yourself why you are not happy about people finding love without going through half a dozen shitty relationships.

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        So you go from about a 1/2 chance of divorce to about a 1/2 chance of divorce. Got it.

        Sounds more like age doesn’t really matter and emotional maturity matters more.

        • A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          30
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The difference between 35% and 60% isn’t insignificant…

          I mean you’re not wrong about emotional maturity but the less years you’ve been alive, the less time you’ve had to emotionally mature

          • NightAuthor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            Just on the math rq, 25% almost certainly means 25% of the risk is reduced… therefore 60%->45%

            • fkn@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Depends/sometimes… If it’s like you said then 25% of that 60% and you get 60-15=45. If it’s some rando looking at 60% total and 35% total and they go “oh neat one of these numbers is 25 bigger/smaller!” Then maybe not?

    • Adramis@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 months ago

      For real. This post has big “I have regrets and/or fears that I missed out on my younger life, and the only way to not be afraid is to invalidate other people’s choices” energy. Every life and every combination of experiences produces a unique piece of art. OP, your life is valid and worthwhile - you don’t have to tear other people down for that to be the case.

      • Custoslibera@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        Oh I have issues with commitment and a constant feeling of ‘Is this the best I can expect?’ but I don’t regret my younger life.

        My ‘weird’ sentiment stems more from me looking in from the outside at relationships where 20 year olds decide they want to spend the rest of their lives with each other. I can’t imagine missing out on potentially meeting someone more compatible. Can you really meet the most compatible person for you when you’re 20?

        When I was 20 I was a very different person, I’m assuming that’s similar for others.

        Other commenters have talked about how they grow with partners but I wonder if it’s truly possible to do that while being so ‘together’ with another person. Some things you have to learn on your own.

        • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Just because you matured late doesn’t mean everyone else does, a lot of ppl are exceptionally emotionally mature by the age of 16 or 17 as well, you should always take a decision based on your maturity level and someone elderlys opinion who also knows you well, like your parents, they probably have a good idea

          • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I honestly don’t know who you’re talking about. I don’t find most adults to even be mature people, especially in relationships. The main thing keeping adult relationships alive is just that they spend most of their time apart from their partner at work.

            This is anecdotal but everyone I’ve ever met that made a high school relationship work didn’t make it work through “maturity”. They were just committed. Often, they were extremely immature and naive and were bonded by the hardships of their 20s.

            Go ahead and ask people who were together when they were younger and made it work. I’ve never heard any of them say they were mature and knew what they were doing.

            • fastandcurious@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              10 months ago

              Fair point, I think it is just that you should be mature enough to work with you partner together, or atleast one person should be at that time, and if they really love each other, then good

              • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                10 months ago

                The way I think about it is that the core idea is that you will stick together with your partner through everything and grow together. Most high schoolers don’t go in with that idea, they just have strong enough emotional connections that they stumble into that.

                The maturity part of being an adult is knowing that’s what you should do and knowing how to do it without hurting the other person in the process.

                It’s like dancing. If someone really wants to dance with you, they’ll be patient as you find your rhythm and you both learn to dance. Feet get stepped on but it’s the same dance. Getting older doesn’t teach you to dance. Being young doesn’t mean you aren’t light on your feet. Maturity in relationships is knowing most of the wrong moves and never dropping your partner.

        • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 months ago

          I can’t imagine missing out on potentially meeting someone more compatible. Can you really meet the most compatible person for you when you’re 20?

          Perfect is the enemy of good. If you hold out for “perfect” you will be alone forever.

          When I was 20 I was a very different person, I’m assuming that’s similar for others.

          Bad assumption. Every human life… every experience is different for everyone. Your lived experiences is not sufficient to gauge ANY other life.

          Some things you have to learn on your own.

          This is a choice… and not a requirement.

        • xttweaponttx
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          100% I agree with ya. Surprised to see so many that don’t. Interesting conversations going on in this thread though!

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      You can be happy and find love without marrying someone.

      Like i think most people would say its weird to marry someone the day after you meet them for the first time, right? Is that you hating peoples happiness and love? or is that you being a realest that that marriage probably wont last and will just be messy for both people?

      • Bunnylux@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        12
        ·
        10 months ago

        That doesn’t necessarily have to be a bad thing though. Divorce doesn’t have to be traumatic, and it should be more normalized.

        • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Wow, really? Sure is an expensive and necessarily painful thing to opt into or to normalize. I’d rather it be normalized to not get married in the first place.

          • naught
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think a divorce is like $80 where I am, but if you have to go to court obvs it’s a lot more. I spent almost nothing on my wedding, granted it was just friends and was an elopement. Marriage has big tax advantages for some, and it’s the only way my spouse was getting health insurance to survive this godforsaken wasteland. It also guarantees that they get a slice of my income if the unforeseeable happens and we split so they can survive.

            I think people should not see marriage as the end goal, but be pragmatic about its costs and benefits, which I think you are getting at too

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            When he says normalize, he’s not saying it is something that people should seek out. In case that was somehow taken that way.

            The problem is there is immense social pressure, especially against women, to never have a divorce. It is seen as a failure, whereas sometimes it is simply the result of circumstances beyond our control or is just something one person, or maybe both, need in their lives.

            I am happily married. Like many people we have had our ups and downs. Every couple should do everything they can to repair their relationship and make it work. But sometimes it’s just not enough. Sometimes you weren’t supposed to be together, sometimes one person has some issue that they just will never resolve, sometimes you find out things about your partner or things emerged down the line. We are not prescient, things change. So people should feel very comfortable divorcing without all of the social baggage that comes with it. Because divorce is inevitable, it is never going to go away. And it is a viable decision for one to make.

            As for marriage, you don’t have to participate and to say you just want it to go away is kind of ridiculous because we both know that is not going to happen. So we deal with reality and accept that divorce is part of the marriage landscape.

          • Bunnylux@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            It’s not that expensive, I did it for $400 amicably. We had a fun time while married and I don’t regret it. Why not just make it easier for people to do what they want and not punish young people for making decisions.

        • Lucidlethargy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yes and no… Yes, divorce shouldn’t be traumatic. But no, people shouldn’t rush into marriage.

        • M137@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Or just be a couple? Save yourselves and everyone else in the families the money and mental energy.

  • ULS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    85
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    It goes up. Now I think people that get married before 40 are weird.

    On serious note… It’s any age. You can tell when a couple is just trying to reproduce an image of “family” because they were told it’s the next thing to do in life. Working in retail id often see families you could tell just went through the motions and that everyone was disconnected from one another. It’s sad.

  • Rolando@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    Imagine the following scenario: you meet someone in college, and when you graduate at 22 you don’t want to split up. They say sure, let’s live together, but we need to get engaged; if it doesn’t work out we can just break it off. After a year you realize your lives are much better together. You decide to get married but not to have kids until you’re 30. If it doesn’t work out you can divorce, but you sign a prenup and at least no kids would be involved.

    If you both have clear and compatible career goals, that scenario saves you a lot of dating drama and gives you valuable support. I wouldn’t call someone in that scenario “weird.”

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah I’ve noticed at least a lot from my high-school group that dating for about 4 years is a good amount of time, me personally and a lot of close friends seemed to have hit their hardships in a relationship around that 4 year mark. Also moving is a good test about how you do in stress haha

      • terminhell@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Been married for 10 years now. There’s one thing I’ve found to be the ultimate relationship tester:

        Furniture Assembly.

        If you can survive assembling a few pieces of IKEA puzzles together it’s probably going to last XD

        • shuzuko@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          ·
          10 months ago

          Our way of surviving furniture assembly is for him to Go Away And Let Me Do It, because I can follow directions and he just tries to slap things together without looking xD

          I love my husband! Knowing when to just let the other person get on with shit is a pretty good litmus test, I agree, lol.

          • terminhell@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Maybe it’s bad luck, but half the time the instructions are physically impossible to follow on certain steps.

        • SomeKindaName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          I just don’t get this. I’ve never had any issues putting together furniture or dated anyone who had trouble with it. I can’t think of a single ex where furniture assembly was an issue.

          • immutable@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            10 months ago

            I think furniture assembly is more about being able to work together for a common goal and communicate what you need the other person to do and listen to what they need you to do.

            For some reason a lot of people struggle to assemble ikea stuff (I honestly don’t know why, I’ve assembled dozens of items and it’s not rocket science). But there’s definitely been moments when I’ve been assembling some shelf and need my wife to assist with a two person step. If the assembly has been frustrating you have a really good test of how well can the two of you communicate through frustration and work together.

            So maybe you are great at ikea assembly and don’t have the frustration factor, or you are a wonderful communicator and listener. For a lot of people though it’s that “this is the 12th step, I’m annoyed because I did the 9th step backwards and had to undo some shit, I’ve stripped this fucking screw… I’m gonna slide this piece and you need to guide it past the shelves, past them, you see how it’s hitting the fucking piece of wood, I need it not to do that!!!”

            You probably shouldn’t marry everyone you can build a shelf with, but if you can’t effectively communicate when frustrated doing something trivial like building a shelf with someone you should work on that before tying the knot.

        • lightnegative@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          She leaves me to furniture assembly thankfully.

          The ultimate relationship tester is: moving house

          Either that or camping setup

        • brbposting
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Better than teaching stick shift?

          If anybody still knows what that is!

          • root_beer@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            My wife and I have put many IKEA pieces together over the years, and she got her license at age 24 after I taught her to drive stick. We’ve been together 24 years, this coming Friday.

    • Captain Aggravated
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      What purpose does engagement and marriage serve there? “Must be this financially trapped to continue?”

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think the main point here is people around those ages aren’t fully capable of making those kinds of decisions in the first place.

      There’s a reason why most marriages end in divorce after all.

      Get married before you have a clue. Get a clue after being married a couple years. Get a divorce because you realize you had no idea what you were doing.

        • Francois@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          The way you phrased it is not quite what the study says.

          They’re not “25% likely of not divorcing” (which would mean there’s a 75% chance of divorce).

          They’re “25% less likely of divorcing”

  • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Wife an I met and got married when I was 25 and she was 19. We had some life experience and knew what we wanted. 15 years later, it’s still amazing, we’re still best friends and inseparable. When I met her I got this weird feeling, like I met someone I had somehow known all my life. It felt like I met my wife in a past life, and was immediately like “oh there you are!” When I met her in this one.

    • root_beer@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Similarly, my wife and I married at ages 23 and 22, respectively, just over twenty years ago. Altogether, we’ll have been by each other’s side for 24 years this Friday (a date I consider more important than our elopement anniversary) and I can’t imagine anyone else by my side on this stupid, cruel journey around the sun.

      • Son_of_dad@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        I maintain that I was married to her in a past life. From our first date we clicked immediately. It felt like I was back into a groove with someone I’ve known forever. She came over to stay at my place for the weekend after like our 4th date, she never left. We’ve been living together since like 3 weeks after meeting, and we have never regretted it. We have kids and love each other and our life immensely.

  • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    I’m in my mid-50s. The generation older than me - my aunts and uncles - generally were in school until grade 8 and were out of the house and working by 16. My mother had her older sister as her teacher.

    24 is not a child. You can vote drive, drive, drink, marry sign legal documents etc. And at least for women fertility begins to decline at 32. If you mean you will continue to grow as a person and develop new interests that hopefully never goes away. I went to grad school and was in academia for over a decade after my PhD. I have made two major shifts in my career since then. Old people still feel like they are in their twenties or early thirties mentally, we joke about it all the time. So congratulations, this is it.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yeah. There was a point when I was thinking I’d keep this account professional and share it with my students. Unlike my other social media accounts. lol

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Don’t do that. Lol. My partner is a professor herself. You don’t want to share this stuff with your students. Professional social media is overrated

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 months ago

            I didn’t in the end. It was mostly because I don’t want undocumented interactions. I have a hard enough time getting them to use office hours.

    • dmonzel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      at least for women fertility begins to decline at 32.

      That’s a little bit of a yikes there, buddy.

      Edit: and additional “yikes” for all of the people that don’t see the problem with assigning a value to women based on how fertile they may or may not be.

      Edit 2: tHe QuAnTiTy Of EgGs! Because women only exist to get pregnant.

      • anewbeginning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        30
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        How can a fact be yikes? It’s only relevant if women want children, but if they do then the earlier the safer it is.

      • JJROKCZ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        They said nothing about the value of a woman being tied to fertility, that came out of mind…

        As for the decline in fertility statement, that has been scientifically proven for decades and assumed for centuries. Women are born with a set amount of eggs, they typically go through at least one per ovulation cycle, they start reaching the end in their 30s and risks of birth defects start increasing in their 30s

      • gibmiser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        Why is that a yikes? More birth defects, complications, start running low on eggs. All of that is just facts…

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        The question was about marriage. There are two reasons that I see people get married. For young people it’s about starting a family. However you and I feel about it personally, legal structures that are in place just make it easier when you’re married. The other reason is for older people. Pensions and estate planning is easier for married couples. Again, I have opinions about it but it remains a plain fact.

        • naught
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          I got married to share healthcare and other tax advantages and do not plan to have children. I’m under 30 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

          • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 months ago

            I envy you. My partner and I are DINKs. There has never been a tax break aimed at our demographic. lol.

      • omgitsaheadcrab
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        In fairness, when we had our first at 34 she was a year off being medically labelled a “geriatric mother”

  • dlrht@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    At what age are you supposed to know what you want for the rest of your life? You will never have an answer to that in any capacity, and not just in marriage. You evolve as a person, you’ll never have a fixed desire for your whole life. And that’s the great thing about marriage and relationships, they also evolve. And it’s about who you want to try doing that with

    • dudinax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      You evolve all the time, but you might have some desires that are fixed for your whole life and you might realize it before you’re an adult.

    • InfiniWheel@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      I feel like it might come from the fact most relationships are pretty short before you are 24. Few people hold onto long lasting relationships by that age and few (at the time) short ones develop into anything reliable.

      A former classmate of mine met a guy and got married after knowing him almost a year, like right out of highschool. Last I heard of her they went through a messy divorce couple of years later, which we all saw coming and tried telling her about.

      • dlrht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        10 months ago

        That sounds more like an issue with that person not being open/receptive to her peers advice. And I think this is true for many people beyond the age of 24 as well

    • Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      At what age are you supposed to know what you want for the rest of your life?

      Maybe around the year that the brain finishes developing, which can vary from person to person but is typically around the mid 20s.

      • dlrht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I see/hear about marriages started at 30+ 40+ 50+ all the time that fail. I see people pivot careers and industries in the middle years of their life. People tastes change all the time as they get older. Let’s not pretend that when your brain finishes developing you suddenly have life figured out/know exactly what you want

        I generally agree that getting married before 24 is a pretty risky move and you have to have thought it through very carefully, but the argument that “you don’t know what you want for the rest of your life” is not the reason why that is. It relates more to life experience/emotional capability/massive foresight. Marriage is more than just “wanting something for the rest of your life”, it’s a commitment, it’s not just some eternal desire you may/may not have

      • dlrht@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Uh, no. If you’re just a kid at 24 according to OP, when do you stop being a kid? When OP arbitrarily says so now? Could’ve sworn legal age meant something like “when you’re no longer a kid and can make your own decisions”. I mean I agree, 24 year olds are basically kids and still have a lot of life experience to gain. But they’re not actually children like you’re weirdly implying I’m saying

  • nyctre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    The age at which you meet has nothing to do with it. Healthy relationships are about evolving together. If you can’t do that or if you do it separately, that’s when it falls apart. Sometimes you’re lucky and you find a compatible person early, sometimes you don’t. That’s all there is to it.

  • zanyllama52@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    10 months ago

    Seems like 24 is an arbitrary number. Some folks consider themselves “ready” for marriage at 18, some at 40, and some never.

    I think its very subjective and situational.

  • JigglySackles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    10 months ago

    Maturity plays a much more important role than age. Some people are never fit to marry, some have what it takes by the time they are 16/17. It’s not often that it plays out well for the youngest ones, and since each year brings new experiences and understandings each year moves along the bell curve of “marriage readiness”. So is it more likely that a 24 year old is more ready for marriage than a 18 year old. Yes. Is it guaranteed? No. I know some 50/60 year olds that still aren’t ready for marriage. They just never learned the skills it takes to have a healthy marriage. Giving an age as a hard cutoff is too arbitrary a measure. Age doesn’t guarantee shit.

    • TakuWalker@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      10 months ago

      That’s it, end of thread. Maturity plays such an important factor it’s astonishing it’s not the first thing being discussed instead of an arbitrary number.

      • Lightfire228@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        As a 27yo, I’m still trying to figure out how to better organize myself. I was one of those kids that never had to take notes in school

        And now that’s coming back to bite me, because I’m completely new to note-taking, but am working on large 20yo code bases with tons of tech-debt and spaghetti madness. Along with tons of technical jargon in a completely different field. I just can’t keep all that in my head anymore

        The point is, i feel like an adult in certain aspects, and a child in others

  • Xariphon@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Can we stop extending “just a kid” into ever older years? Society already years anybody under 18 like they’re the same as a goddamn fetus. Human life expectancy being what it is, we shouldn’t be treating people… not even like they don’t know anything but like they couldn’t even conceivably know anything for fully a third of it.

    • TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      10 months ago

      I don’t know how it is for you, but when I look back at 24-year-old me, I am not impressed. I guess what I’m saying is that there are a lot of us who definitely don’t have their shit together when they’re 24. They say your prefrontal cortex isn’t fully developed until 25 at the earliest, but I feel like it was closer to 30 for me. Granted, I’m kind of a dummy anyway, so this probably doesn’t apply to everyone.

      • Dr. Bob@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        10 months ago

        Just wait. 45 year old me was cringe. And 35 year old me? How did that guy even have friends.

      • Risk@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        10 months ago

        That reads as “I couldn’t make those decisions at that age, so obviously no one else could.”

        I say this as someone that had my first child at 23, after talking about it with my girlfriend since the age of 19.

        We don’t regret a thing. (Well, apart from not winning the lottery. Yet.)

      • BlanketsWithSmallpox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        I was a shit person at 24 who knew nothing so everyone must’ve been a shittier person at 24 who knew even less than me, vibes.

      • Laticauda@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 months ago

        I don’t look at other people as if they are or were me, I look at them as if they are their own people who may or may not be living their life differently from me.

    • Ignotum@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      10 months ago

      Is 18 years a third of your life given todays life span?

      Where do you live where the expected life span is just 56? O.o

  • Siegfried@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    10 months ago

    Me 32, i dont have a fucking clue of what i want for the rest of my life. Maybe those couples that married in their early 20s wanted to explore together what they wanted in life. Good for them.

    • Oka@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I understand the roots of marriage, but I want a partner who would be ok with parting ways in the future. We live once, why do we have to commit to 1 person for most of it? Things I enjoyed 5 years ago I don’t care for now. Tastes change.

      • MrVilliam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        10 months ago

        Marriage isn’t for everybody, and that’s okay. As long as you aren’t stringing partners along who are looking to get married when you already know that you aren’t, then your choice doesn’t seem to be hurting anybody.

        I’m 35 and married. Sure, tastes change, but my wife and I chose good partners in each other; we won’t hate each other or get irreparably sick of each other, we make a great team, and we understand each other’s limitations and are mature enough to ask for help. We let each other in. There is security and stability in marriage. I’m not great at meeting new people, so not having to go on another first date again is a huge relief for me. Making a good first impression is fucking exhausting. In contrast, I know how my wife is feeling pretty much just by glancing at her, and it’s really fulfilling to be on the same wavelength as my partner like that, especially because we’re also open communicators who can share the honest, fucked up feelings without worrying about judgment. So we’re basically each other’s therapist, but we share housework and meals and money, and we snuggle and kiss and fuck. I can understand that that’s not appealing to everybody, but it’s hard for me to imagine a version of myself who doesn’t want this. But again, it’s not for everybody, and it’s perfectly okay to not want it for yourself.

        • Oka@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Now that’s a healthy relationship. I agree marriage isn’t for some, just like having kids isn’t for some. To each their own, perhaps my views will change in the future.

  • Imgonnatrythis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Not going to try to change your mind about this opinion, but I’ll take a stab at shaming you for being so vocal about a thought that is very much “othering”. Maybe turn down the judgement a bit, you don’t know people.

    • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      10 months ago

      What’s truly insane is people who marry under 20. And if you think it’s possible to know who you are and what you want at that age, you have a very simplistic view of the world. Or you’re brainwashed by those who reared you, ie you have a very simplistic view of the world.

      • dudinax@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        10 months ago

        No, teenagers are often gifted with some nugget of wisdom or other about their lives, it’s just that parents and random commenters online never believe it.

        I knew I wanted to get married and to whom. I also knew it was a good idea. I only waited to mid-twenties because she wasn’t sure. 30 years farther along, we’re still married and teenaged me is proved right.

        Cynical, older, slower me might have screwed it up somehow.

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          I’m happy that it worked out for you. I think you got lucky. I don’t think most people are mature enough to make such a call at 20yo.

          • dudinax@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Of course I was lucky. The decisions we make around starting a family can reverberate for centuries. Even if we had enough information (we don’t), I don’t think people are mature enough at any age to make the right call,

    • braxy29@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      someone at 24 has several more years of experience in the adult world. someone at 24 has several more years of neurological development (which isn’t complete until around 25). in other words, at 24 someone has better context for decision-making and better decision-making ability than someone who is 18.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        On average sure. But your statement at its face is simply wrong. Older does not mean they make better decisions.

        • braxy29@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          indeed, lots of people make poor decisions regardless of age. but statistically speaking, 24 year olds have resources (experience, development) which increase their capacity to make better decisions.

  • charles@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    10 months ago

    I see a pretty stark difference between people who married young and had kids right away, vs people who married young and enjoyed their time for a while before having kids. The ones who had kids seem weird to me, never got a chance to goof off in their 20s and figure out who they are. The ones who waited feel more normal. But that’s just my experience.

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      The ones who had kids seem weird to me, never got a chance to goof off in their 20s and figure out who they are.

      I definitely needed to goof off in my 20s and figure out who I was. But not everybody is like that, and the meme in question suggests it’s “weird” to know who you are and not need to goof off.

    • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      How old are you? No need to be specific this isn’t a creepy question lol just roughly what age are you? Because I don’t think we can make any sort of broad assessment until the people who had kids when they were young have kids out of the house. I know plenty
      of people who are enjoying their 40’s with kids happily going off to college around that time. If you have kids in your early to mid 30’s - assuming you stopped at 35, which isn’t a given - you’re starting to have them out in your mid 50’s. Those are very different times for you, physically, mentally, professionally, etc. even if it doesn’t seem like it.

      I imagine for many in this thread it is too early to be making a final assessment. I think also a lot of people here forget that nobody is thrusting these decisions upon them (except maybe overeager parents who want to be grandparents, in which case they need to back off). Different people have different objectives/goals in life. They aren’t worse off for not doing it your way.

      The strongest marriage I know is my buddy from high school who married his high school sweetheart, right when they graduated college at 21. They just had their 3rd kid at 35 and they’re ecstatic. First was at 22 or so.

      The point is a post like this shows a certain amount of hubris/lack of imagination/lack of exposure to people with different lifestyles and priorities.

      • Saik0@lemmy.saik0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I just can’t imagine being a grandfather at >70… and seeing NOTHING of that generation before I’m doomed to dementia/death.

        My Grandparents were a HUGE part of my life… and knowing that some people don’t want to be that positive influence to their grandkids lives is disappointing. Raising kids is a hard thing to do. To not be around when my daughters need the help is something that I refuse to acknowledge as “healthy” just because some numpties on the internet think that everyone should be older than 35 to have kids.

        As it stands, I haven’t needed my parents much at all for raising my kids (I was 26 for my oldest, I would have been fine going a bit younger as I was more or less in the same situation). But they’re there if something happens (familial fallbacks are great bus factor multipliers.)

        A lot of what I’m reading here sounds like most people seem to think that you should be 100% self-sustaining before you do ANYTHING… and that’s just not an answer that works in my brain.

        Edit: This whole premise is actually a really good way to kill generational knowledge. My dad doesn’t know nearly the same stuff my grandfather does about the family.

    • Alivrah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is the main point here, IMO. A child is a huge responsibility and the early 20s is a period of life you’re still figuring things out. Culture also plays a role here; where I’m from, people are deciding to live together (without having kids) for a couple of years before formally marrying.

      • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Having a kid in your 20s is not for you, but you can’t just assume that that is the case for everyone else.

        I mean, let’s take this post: what is so magical about 24? Why not 25? Why not 23? I imagine the number was pretty arbitrary. It just sounded right to OP.