• MarcoPOLOOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    10 months ago

    The US wanted to strike Iranian targets without retaliation in order to not lose face globally. Tehran says no. If I were serving on a US military base in the Middle East, I’d be looking for ways to take leave because things are about to get hot.

        • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          10 months ago

          “In 1951, Mohammad Mosaddegh was elected Prime Minister of Iran, voted in by the legislature and confirmed by the Shah. Mosaddegh became enormously popular after he nationalized the oil industry of Iran, which had been largely controlled by foreign interests. He worked to weaken the monarchy of Mohammad Reza Pahlavi until Mosaddegh was removed in the 1953 Iranian coup d’état—initially an Anglo-American covert operation that marked the first time the United States had participated in an overthrow of a foreign government during the Cold War”

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran#1951–1978:_Mosaddegh,_Mohammad_Reza_Pahlavi

          There’s a reason Iranians call the US The Great Satan.

      • Telodzrum@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because Iran is resposible for the deaths of three US service members in Jordan and the wounding of dozens more.

        Hitting Iran in Iran was never a likely scenario, though. The response will almost certainly be to Iran-aligned terrorist and/or militia groups outside of Iranian borders. There’s a small chance that it will be to direct Iranian assets outside Iranian borders, but most people in the FA space don’t think that this is going to happen, either.

    • Philo@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 months ago

      Why? Didn’t you read what Iran said? They said if we strike in Iran, they strike an asset in the Middle East. That is saying If you hit me, I’ll break one of your toys because I’m afraid to face you directly. After all Iran’s bravado and muscle flexing, they are freaking cowards.

      • taladar
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        Because unlike your power fantasies of the big strong US in the real world people get hurt when countries get into wars or even smaller conflicts, even if they are not an existential threat to both countries.

    • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago
      1. Gives weapons to group saying they’ll exterminate Palestinians
      2. Group uses weapons to attack Palestinians
      3. Palestinian allies are upset about the situation
      4. Don’t threaten me bro!
            • Hyperreality@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              Welcome to Lemmy.ml.

              Home to plenty of cosplay communists who unironically support Christian Nationalist Russia, the Taliban, Hamas and the Islamic Republic of Iran. They see a guy supporting the Taliban? They give that guy an upvote, because that’s the kind of top mind left-wing anti-imperialist they are. I’m sure someone will be around shortly to ‘whatabout Israel’ me and suggest I’ve got to pick a side.

              The whole place is a shithole filled to the brim with teenaged contrarians. At least I hope they’re mostly teenagers, pretty pathetic if they aren’t.

              I don’t know why I haven’t blocked the entire instance. Most people in the fediverse have.

              The sad thing is, these horrible people infect left wing parties, and really hinder political progress. Last I checked, in the US some of them even turned on Bernie Sanders, because he pointed out that Hamas are less than super.

              And sure, some of the users here are ok, but as the saying goes: “If 9 people sit down at a table with 1 Nazi without protest, there are 10 Nazis at the table.” People here are often ok with people who support some of the most right wing religious extremists out there.

              • mihies@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                You know, Iran was once a nice democratic country, not so long ago. Only to get a coup organized by the most democratic and peaceful country ever and installing a bloody dictator instead.

                • Hyperreality@kbin.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  Yes, I did know that history happened. Did you know that this doesn’t make Iran or its proxies the good guys?

                  Did you know that German nationalism and militarism can be traced back to the thirty years war, and that thanks to the involvement of foreign powers areas of modern Germany experienced population declines of over 50%. Did you know that Germans being victims in that war, doesn’t mean the Nazis were the good guys?

                  You know, Israel once had a ceasefire with Hamas not so long ago. Only to get attacked by Hamas on October the 7th. Did you also know that this doesn’t mean Israel are the good guys and that this is not a valid excuse for Israel arguably committing crimes against humanity in Gaza?

                  Did you know that the Umayyad Caliphate colonised Southern Spain? Did you know that this doesn’t mean the Spanish and European far-right are the good guys when they use the story of the reconquista to justify their Islamophobia?

                  What’s that? Too much history? We’re only allowed to go back to 1953?

                  But hey, thank you for proving my point about lemmy.ml being full of contrarian and anti-imperialist top minds. The kind of people who think they’re left wing, but then make excuses for an Islamic theocracy which kills young women for protesting for their rights.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    I honestly feel like Iran’s proxies have more clout than Iran.

    Hamas staged a losing war for a long period which is still going. Houthis disrupted world trade by targeting ships off coast.

    Meanwhile Iran got harassed by Pakistan for using some light artillery on some probably random Balochis.

    It doesn’t really matter if they have the weapons when they can’t really use them all that effectively themselves.

  • YeetPics@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    Well maybe they’ll attack a us ship on their own next time instead of delegating their dirty work 🤷

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, because what the US needs right now is another hot war, it is wise to encourage escalation into a direct conflict with Iran.

      You do understand that will just make the US empire crumble faster, right?

      • YeetPics@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Sorry for wanting iran to make open moves instead of their usual paying other groups to do their dirty work.

        I don’t want another war, nobody does. These games that are being played aren’t mine, I am just judging the players.

  • Mango@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    10 months ago

    On one hand, we shouldn’t be going around picking fights.

    In the other hand, lol try us.