[email protected] to Greentext · 1 year agoAnon goes apeimagemessage-square37fedilinkarrow-up1390arrow-down128
arrow-up1362arrow-down1imageAnon goes ape[email protected] to Greentext · 1 year agomessage-square37fedilink
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44arrow-down4·edit-21 year agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 year agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-squareDaefsdedalinkfedilinkarrow-up15·1 year agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.