• unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I have to disagree. Accessibility of underground transport is abhorrent. Changing from underground to aboveground buses and trains is also shit. The space use of public transport in comparison to car infrastructure is completely negligible. If anything put all the cars underground as they are ugly and stinky. This picture also give you happy chemical because it is green and is not another dead, sealed asphalt hellscape.

    • reev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      10 months ago

      I quite like underground transport, the stations can be absolutely stunning.

          • rambaroo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            The London tube is full of soot from the days when they burned coal in there. It’s the only subway I’ve been in where every time I walked out, there would be black tarry shit in my nose.

            Also, the brakes for trains throw all kinds of dust into the air in subways

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        10 months ago

        Its literally underground. Anyone that has a wheelchair, old people, blind people etc are not gonna enjoy using it. Elevators are often out of order and even if not its a hurdle.

        • qwrty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Ramps, escalators, tiles, and seating. There is nothing inherently not accessible about subways, we just choose not to make them accessible. When I was in Japan, there didn’t seem to be any issue preventing wheelchair users, old people, or blind people from using the train system. Escalators can be used by people in wheel chairs and old people (and presumably blind people too, but I’m not sure.) There were tactile tiles in the floor to guide the blind, and there was plenty of seating specifically dedicated to old people, disabled people, and pregnant people. There were also wheelchair accessible cars on every train. As far as I could tell, it seemed just as accessible and easy to use for them as anyone else. (Also elevators were only usually kept open for the people who needed them)

        • ninpnin@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          You sound like a concern troll. By this logic houses with more than 1 floor are by definition not accessible

          • Draugnoss@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            But… They are literally not. My family never had the ability to move to any house they want because everything needs to be accessible on the ground floor.

            • ninpnin@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              What should I conclude of your personal experience, if it conflicts with what I hear from the disabled people in my life?

              • Draugnoss@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                Maybe the fact that the disabled people in your life are lucky enough to be able to enough or be in positions where they can still function well?

                Fuck, we can’t live in a house with proper door thresholds if we want the person in my life to have any semblance of independence.

                Please, don’t assume your experiences are universal.