The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn.

  • Deceptichum
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    The article has no mention of criminalising AI generated porn, only deepfakes?

    • roastedDeflator@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      To my understanding it does?

      The proposed rules will criminalize the non-consensual sharing of intimate images, including deepfakes made by AI tools, which could help deter revenge porn. Cyber-stalking, online harassment, misogynous hate speech and “cyber-flashing,” or the sending of unsolicited nudes, will also be recognized as criminal offenses.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Where does it mention AI generated porn in that? AI generated deeepfakes, sure but not catch-all AI porn.

        For example if someone made some AI hentai porn, what part of that sentence would imply that’s going to be criminalised, because I can’t see it in there.

        • nevernevermore@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think it’s more about the “non-consensual” part of the first sentence in the article. Ai generated porn of nobody in particular=probably fine. Ai generated porn of a real life person=probably unethical.