• Buffalox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    120
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    I don’t get it, how does depositing a check become a police matter?
    PS: It says cash first and deposit further down, I’m assuming deposit must be the correct part.

    Edit: PPS. I know there is racism and this happens in USA, but the amount of amateur hour from the Banks procedure, to the people working there and the police responding to a non issue is mind numbing for a person coming from Denmark, where banks are run professionally, and the police almost is too.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      155
      ·
      10 months ago

      Racist bank employees made it a police matter when they assumed he was passing a fraudulent check and called to have the guy arrested for being a negro in possession of money.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        But how do they “assume” this? And why does the police accept it without any evidence?
        I mean the amateurish incompetence is staggering.

        Isn’t it normal procedure to deposit the check until it’s cleared?

          • minibyte
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            80
            ·
            10 months ago

            Wait until they hear about folks that get caught driving while black.

            • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              64
              ·
              10 months ago

              Or try voting. Or try electing representation. Or try owning firearms like the white folks.

              Basically anything while trying to be black in America.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            10 months ago

            No, I know this happens, I just don’t get how the amateur hour process is allowed to continue?

            • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              38
              ·
              10 months ago

              I just don’t get how the amateur hour process is allowed to continue?

              The first black student to enroll in a white high school, following desegregation.

              The current Republican frontrunner’s primary voting base.

              It’s the same generation in both images. The first image is Elizabeth Eckford, one of the first black students to enroll in Little Rock high school following desegregation in 1957. Notice that she’s surrounded by a crowd of angry white students. The second image is Donald Trump’s primary voting base.

            • [email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              10 months ago

              How many generations ago was brutal, undiluted systemic racism accepted? ‘Bout 2.5. it takes a while to fix, given that segregationists instilled such strong feelings into their progeny. It’s easier to break something than to fix it, most especially when someone is actively working to obstruct the repair. It takes 2 seconds to pop a tire and 20 minutes to change.

              • Buffalox@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                20
                ·
                10 months ago

                it takes a while to fix

                This is reality I know, but it’s unacceptable, this kind of racism needs to be punished harder, to make racists understand their behavior is unacceptable.

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          42
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          It sounds like you’re learning why segregation had to be ended at gunpoint. Literally.

          Racists are trash, and trash doesn’t spontaneously turn to gold.

        • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          31
          ·
          10 months ago

          If a bank employee KNOWS someone is trying to deposit a fraudulent check, they should call the police to arrest that person instead of letting them leave and try again.

          But they had no evidence, merely the racist assumption that a black man could not have come by that much money legally.

          • KevonLooney@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            ·
            10 months ago

            This is basically correct. If the check is from that particular bank they can easily call the person who wrote it and ask “did you write this check?”. But no one would do that for a deposit. If you work at a bank you can recognize your own checks just by looking at them.

            If the check is for a different bank and looks really fake, a bank might not deposit it and ask some questions about it (“who gave it to you?”). This is to protect depositors from fake check scams (“deposit this check and give me back 10%”). If the person really wanted to deposit it, the bank employees might recommend cashing it at the bank listed on the check. They will know if it’s real.

            I actually saw a similar situation to the one here. A black non-customer had a large denomination check that looked different from normal checks. After some questions, he said he got it from a settlement. It turned out that the check was fine, the check design was just not used often. Total time was like 20 minutes to verify the check, open the account, and deposit it. He said he would bring his next settlement check next time.

            See? Easy to verify it and not be racist.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            First I heard was driving while black, because black people are stopped 10 times more frequently than whites. I know the term.
            I was just pointing out that being racist and discriminating based on color is de facto illegal, while doing x while black is not.

        • Damdy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 months ago

          Don’t think it said anything about the police response other than that they were called to be fair.

        • Malfeasant@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          why does the police accept it without any evidence?

          “Will we get to beat someone up without consequences? Hell yeah, who cares if he did anything or not”

      • Wrench@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        ·
        10 months ago

        I mean, the cops killed George Floyd for using a counterfeit $20 bill at a convenience store in Minneapolis.

        Detroit (where this happened) is just one state over.

      • OpenStars@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        That’s what makes matters so complicated to try to address - e.g. sometimes cops are racist themselves, directly, but other times they are not and yet still any race-blind application of “enforcement” is going to merely reinforce the racist policies of society.

        “Sad:-(”

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 months ago

        Yes, and being a banker and policeman while racist, which is actually illegal. Being black remains legal despite Republicans best efforts.
        USA is an extremely scary place, especially for people of any color other than white.

          • Buffalox@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            Well I cannot say what’s common in USA, but the literal meaning of cash seems to me to be getting literal cash in your hand. While deposit is to deposit it into an account, for withdrawal later, like when the check is cleared.
            I’m guessing if people use those terms interchangeably, they are in error half the time.
            IDK practices in USA, but here some checks can be cashed immediately when they are from trusted parties, like a bankers check, but AFAIK you still need to have an account with the bank to cash it.
            That said both cash and checks are extremely rare here now, almost everything and everybody have gone electronic.
            Paying cash above about 8K USD or 50k DKK is actually illegal now, to prevent money laundering.