• Melllvar@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    We’ve been covering many stories about a potential TikTok ban, including how unconstitutional it clearly is, how pointless it clearly is, and how even those who back it don’t seem to have a good explanation of why, beyond some vague handwaving about “China.”

    The bill isn’t nearly as bad as they want you to think. It bans companies in Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran from operating social media apps in US markets, forcing them to sell if they already do. These four countries are already restricted from accessing sensitive parts of the US economy, with forced sale being a legal option. Really, the only novel part of the bill is applying these kinds of restrictions to software.

    And the bill doesn’t actually punish or restrain users’ speech. It does restrain the social media company’s speech, but that may not be enough to overturn the bill on 1st amendment grounds. If you understand that social media exists to collect vast amounts of user data then you must also understand how the government has a legitimate interest in keeping that data out of an adversary’s hands. The only real question is whether the government has a compelling interest, because that’s the standard that a court would apply to this bill. And I daresay it might.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      I hate the amount of data American social media companies collect and what they do with it

      I REALLY hate having Chinese or Russian or [Insert Authoritarian Hostile Country] doing it.

      American companies do it for the pursuit of profits, Companies from these countries are doing it to topple our government or whatever.

      Something something the devil you know…

      • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        It’s profitable for the companies to sell it to the government… Basically just adds a step to the government getting it

      • Match!!@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        8 months ago

        this but the opposite, Chinese social media companies are taking my data for profit, American social media is doing it to topple the US government (also for profit)

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        You do know that those mere profits are used to purchase whatever they want from the government, right?

    • conciselyverbose
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      36
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yeah, it’s very clearly not unconstitutional.

      The constitution doesn’t grant jack shit for rights to enemy states.

      • Melllvar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Musk’s companies are already based in the US. The issues you raise, however valid, are not really relevant to a discussion of this bill.

    • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      So they are going to put in place some hard data collection and selling regulation, right? Right?

            • SoupBrick@yiffit.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Which forces Tiktok to sell or be banned, correct? The issue I see is: why not just create regulation for the root problems instead of just focusing on that app? The only reason I can see, is that their priorities do not lay with protecting people, but forcing a foreign business to sell it’s IP to strictly American companies. Wether that decision has to do with the intentional or unintentional promotion of the US’s direct involvement in the genocide in Gaza or just Big social media companies lobbying for the removal of a competitor, we can only speculate. Both sides are doing their best to push this bill, when have the ®s collectively banded together to create positive change? The point being, reading the bill is cool and all, but you do have to ask, “Why target a specific company instead of the alleged problems of foreign adversaries getting their hands on our data?” If we had hard data collection and selling regulations, it would not only allow them to ban predatory apps (foreign or domestic) but also ensure sensitive data cannot even reach our enemy’s hands.

    • abhibeckert@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      While I agree - the part you’re missing is the vast majority of TikTok users are outside the United States.

      TikTok doesn’t want to sell. They want some sort of “independent” subsidiary where ByteDance still profits from (and controls) TikTok and the subsidiary worries about compliance with US law. But the thing is, that’s already the current structure.

      I wouldn’t be surprised if they refuse to sell and wind up being banned. ByteDance doesn’t want to lose all their US customers, but they’d likely prefer that to selling.

      • spongebue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        the vast majority of TikTok users are outside the United States.

        Then they can decide that it would be better to not serve the United States users and keep the “vast majority” of their userbase as-is

  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    8 months ago

    It appears I am getting bored with the entire Internet.

    When we had web forums with thread bumping, I got an endless stream of interesting and entertaining things to react to despite there being relatively few users.

  • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 months ago

    TikTok’s DAU growth rate has collapsed.

    That might as well be saturation. If you already have nearly 100% of the target demographic on your app, there’s not much room to grow.

    Also, that data is from some mobile analytics firm, how reliable are those numbers?

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Also, that data is from some mobile analytics firm, how reliable are those numbers?

      With all the data these damn companies vacuum up, it better be damn reliable, otherwise what is even the fucking point lmao

      • AggressivelyPassive@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        8 months ago

        We don’t know that. What are they even measuring? New installs? New accounts? What is a DAU? Opened the app this day? Engaged with the app? Looked at a notification? What is the measured user base? Can this population be called representative for the entire user base?

        Without detailed information about that, this kind of data is basically astrology.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      I imagine, that’s most governments. The political pushback will be lessened a lot, if people lose interest, so then a block is more likely to go through.

    • Contend6248@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      Politics going for worthless easy quick wins instead of lasting changes for the better has a history of it’s own.

  • CCF_100
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    Good. That platform malware needs to die.

  • LifeOfChance@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    TikTok is just pushing advertisements and people who promote their shop. In-between you have 2 or 3 videos where it’s on of the few trends going around.

  • Samsy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    But since it’s banned, it’s interesting again. /s