• Crackhappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    That’s an admirable goal, and I applaud the immense effort undertaken to make the OSS dream true.

    • Alex@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      The ISA may be open but I’m pretty sure the microarchitecture will be totally proprietary. Even with a kick ass microarchitecture they may still struggle if they can’t use the latest process nodes to actually manufacture the chips.

      Having said that I suspect the main challenge RISCV is going to face is the software ecosystem. That stuff can take a decade to build and requires a degrees of cooperation between all the companies building chips.

    • Moonrise2473@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think they’re doing this for oss reasons

      I don’t think they’re even required to publish the design, they could keep it proprietary

      • timbuck2themoon
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re not. They’re doing it because they fear being SOL if America/the West enforces more sanctions on things like ARM chips/designs or Intel, etc.

        And yes, IIRC RISC-V is MIT licensed or something close. Basically companies can take it and implement whatever on top and not have to contribute back.

  • pastermil
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 months ago

    Alibaba’s research arm

    server-class RISC-V processor

    Is this on purpose?

  • Linkerbaan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    RiscV has been used for small specific tasks but running a whole OS on it still seems far fetched with so many libraries being unsupported. (yes it exists already but that is also very limited in functionality)