Letitia James asked the firm to show it’s capable of paying the bond if needed.

New York Attorney General Letitia James questioned Thursday whether the California company that underwrote former President Donald Trump’s $175 million bond in his New York civil fraud case is financially qualified to handle a bond of that size.

In a court filing, James requested that Knight Specialty Insurance Company submit papers demonstrating it is financially capable of paying the bond should Trump lose his appeal in the case.

The California company is not registered with the New York Department of Financial Services.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    786 months ago

    Good for her, really fucking hitting everything she can against this asshole.

    And fuck these California insurance companies. You can’t even get home insurance now from these assholes, but somehow they are willing to insure Trumps criminal nonsense. Someone should go after these companies next.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      12
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      EDIT: I was mostly wrong. He insures subprime auto loans.

      Original post: It isn’t an insurance company. It’s a guy who owns a company giving subprime auto loans and then repos as soon as they default. Fuck this guy, but he’s not an insurance company.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      46 months ago

      Hey, if Trump becomes president this guy will share the presidents balls with Putin. Not a bad investment

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      -216 months ago

      Nah come on now. Insurance is all about numbers not emotions. Chance of Trump skipping bail near 0%, chance of wooden housing in Florida getting trashed in the next few years? 100%

      I get your emotive response but it’s not based upon facts.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        386 months ago

        It’s not about skipping bail. This is for his civil trial, so it’s an appeal bond. The real question is: what’s the chance that Trunp loses his appeal, but still refuses to pay the penalty? I think that’s meaningfully >0%.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          11
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Ok agree, my bad, that does make it worse.

          Also can we talk about this

          Donald Trump did not expressly direct him to reverse engineer financial statements, he ordered him to do so indirectly, in his ‘mob voice.’"

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    71
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    I’m sure there’s no problem here for the company.

    Step one: Overinflate the assets of the bail bond company.

    Step two: Claim the assets of the company and get loans based on those inflated values.

    Step three: If found to be fraudulent in said valuation, take it to court.

    Step four: Go back to step one.

  • @Varyk
    link
    226 months ago

    Go Letitia!

    • FuglyDuck
      link
      fedilink
      English
      136 months ago

      I like her. I really do.

      all though, all this popcorn I’m eating is ruining my diet.

      • Admiral Patrick
        link
        fedilink
        English
        86 months ago

        It’s doing more damage to my complexion than my diet. All that movie theater butter is coming straight out of my pores.

        Should probably also diversify my 401k into both Orville Redenbacher and whatever company makes acne cream.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          Conagra Brands for the popcorn, and basically every CPG conglomerate makes acne medicine. Except maybe Nestle lol.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            36 months ago

            Nestle owns like 30 percent of L’Oréal which is a makeup company which I’m certain has acne creams and stuff lul.

  • FaceDeer
    link
    fedilink
    145 months ago

    Shouldn’t the bond already be paid, though? If they won’t accept an IOU from Trump himself why are they accepting an IOU from someone on his behalf?

  • @Habahnow
    link
    14
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Edit: seems specific to Brave, as neither Chrome nor Firefox exhibit the same behavior. Got the extension autoplay stopper in order to stop autoplay as even Brave’s settings don’t stop autoplay.

    Wow, auto playing video, that also has audio. not going to click on an ABCnews link again

      • @Habahnow
        link
        15 months ago

        huh, Brave auto plays, but neither chrome nor Firefox do. Something I’ll have to check, thanks!

  • RubberDuck
    link
    fedilink
    116 months ago

    LoL. Can’t wait to see the outcome. Probably they can but if they ended up providing a bind under false pretenses.

    Maybe something to do with why the paperwork was unsigned and all. Noone dared to…

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    76 months ago

    why can you just guarantee that shit. Pay up.

    It’s not like anyone else can come and say trust me bro