• YeetPics@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      When everyone dislikes your poorly thought out reactions and you respond to that disdain with calls for nuking entire hemispheres of the only planet we can live on, you kinda have to hide your identity/ideologies by way of obfuscation.

      They seem proud and vocal in their echo chamber but these fools are weaker than a watery shit irl.

    • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      35
      ·
      8 months ago

      Obfuscation. They know lemmygrad is too obviously tankie for most people, but lemmy.ml is not so obvious. The .ml is a dogwhistle that a lot of users won’t understand, so they can buy some measure of legitimacy that way. I guess they keep lemmygrad because they also want a place where they can go full mask-off.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        If your theory is correct, then why would they also keep many of their users uninformed? Referring to Lemmy.ml, of course. You claim it’s for legitimacy, but doesn’t that cease to fulfill its purpose? Is the goal to make a generalist instance, but with slightly more MLs, but also divert the MLs to Lemmygrad?

        I’m not sure your theory is correct, I think Lemmy.ml is just what it says it is: a generalist, FOSS and Privacy focused instance run by the devs, who are MLs.

        • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          23
          ·
          8 months ago

          If your theory is correct, then why would they also keep many of their users uninformed? Referring to Lemmy.ml, of course. You claim it’s for legitimacy, but doesn’t that cease to fulfill its purpose?

          Because the users that don’t know what the instance is for are the ones that help lend legitimacy to it, because then people like you can believe that it’s just a general instance with no political undertones. You aren’t running cover for them, you are their cover.

          Just think for a second about what you’re suggesting. They want to make an instance that is to lend legitimacy to a fringe political ideology, and they openly tell all of their users that that’s exactly what they’re doing? Then all anyone would need to do to destroy that legitimacy would be to publish whatever message the users receive explaining the true purpose of the instance. The cover only works if it’s deniable, and your idea would make it completely undeniable.

          Is the goal to make a generalist instance, but with slightly more MLs, but also divert the MLs to Lemmygrad?

          That is one of the goals, yes.

          • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            8 months ago

            Sorry, I really think this is ridiculous. Is Lemmy.world a cover for Liberalism, because it’s run by liberals? Is db0 a cover for Anarchism and Libertarian Socialism, because db0 is a Libertarian Socialist? This is just red-scare style paranoia.

            The very existance of Lemmygrad.ml should prove that there is an explicitly Marxist-Leninist space for MLs, and Lemmy.ml is a generalist instance for people who don’t care enough about that but want a server dedicated to FOSS and Privacy.

            • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              29
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Is Lemmy.world a cover for Liberalism, because it’s run by liberals? Is db0 a cover for Anarchism and Libertarian Socialism, because db0 is a Libertarian Socialist?

              Liberals and libertarian socialists are usually pretty open about what they believe, so there’s no cover needed. They’re not covert ideologies like tankies have.

              However neoliberalism is a fairly hated ideology. If the people who ran lemmy.world were literally the same people running a neoliberalism sub on that instance and they also ran thatcher.love or whatever, and they banned people for saying neoliberalism was trash, then yeah, it would be a reasonable inference that lemmy.world was some sort of entryist ploy.

              It is the existence of lemmygrad combined with the behaviour of the people running lemmy.ml that makes the case to defederate. If that happens and you don’t like it, you could always migrate your account, unless you like it there, in which case you’re probably not the normie you first appeared to be.

              Edit: changed “fringe” to “covert”.

              • rambling_lunatic
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                7
                ·
                8 months ago

                Completely tangential, but imma be real with you: libsocs are fringe too.

                Indeed, socialism of any sort is pretty fringe in most of the West.

                • Excrubulent@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  That’s a fair point, although I would say socialism is becoming less fringe, and it seems like the various types of libsoc are the main forms of socialism because people have seen the failures of state based solutions, even amongst demsocs/socdems.

                  That said, I kind of agree and the word “fringe” didn’t sit quite right. On reflection a better word would be “covert”, since ideologies that explicitly want to dominate people tend to hide what they are, since they know it’s not acceptable to state their aims up front. That’s really the idea I was getting at.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                24
                ·
                8 months ago

                Lemmy.world regularly bans Marxist-Leninists, it is a two-way street there.

                Again, I truly don’t see how Lemmygrad taking the marxist-leninists means Lemmy.ml is a cover for Marxism-Leninism, it’s a non-political community focused on FOSS and Privacy.

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    10
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Anecdotally I have seen Marxist-Leninists calmly arguing in politics communities banned for being “tankies.” I will admit, I do not have any examples on-hand.

                  • Gabu@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Or because they were toxic assholes?

                    If that were the case, we wouldn’t see a single rightwinger over here. Unfortunately, there are many.

                • Kedly@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  15
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  “it’s a non-political community focused on FOSS and Privacy.” -moderated and controlled at least somewhat by tankies who will delete your comment and possibly ban you for saying things about their flavour of communism that they dont like

            • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              arrow-down
              13
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              The whole reason this was posted is because of the users posting they got banned from ml for stating facts that tankies disagree with.

                • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  26
                  arrow-down
                  13
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  They’ll ban you for acknowledging the existence of the Uyghur genocide, for one

                  Edit: wording

                  • Pan_Ziemniak@midwest.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    21
                    arrow-down
                    10
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Or calling out russian and chinese talking points. And then they have the same 10 users popping up whenever the instances are criticized saying “akshally privacy and no tanks…” (see above)

                • Kedly@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  19
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Merely using the word Tankie has gotten me bigotry ruled recently. .ml is infected with Tankies regardless of what other people use it for.

                  Edit: Oooh, the Tankie Brigade are here

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      26
      ·
      8 months ago

      Lemmy.ml is focused on FOSS and Privacy, and is generally a “generalist” instance with that FOSS and Privacy slant.

      Lemmygrad.ml is an explicitly Marxist-Leninist instance for Marxist-Leninists.

      They really aren’t comparable instances outside of the dev connection.

    • JimboDHimbo@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      29
      ·
      8 months ago

      They don’t. Its basically saying that both instances are leftist based, which is true.