• ZombiFrancis
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    8 months ago

    I think for many is shock and surprise is that anything even remotely “ml” is even allowed. Like something illegal is being allowed in plain sight.

        • melpomenesclevage@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Not formally. Talk to a cop while wearing a red bandana and clothing with a red star or hammer and sickle on it.

          (Please don’t ban me for suggesting suicide, I don’t actually want them to do this)

          • oatscoop@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            If you had actually read the Wikipedia article:

            In 1973, a federal district court in Arizona decided that the act was unconstitutional, and Arizona could not keep the party off the ballot in the 1972 general election (Blawis v. Bolin). In 1961, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the act did not bar the party from participating in New York’s unemployment insurance system (Communist Party v. Catherwood).

            So yes, the law passed during the the McCarthy era … and was afterwards declared unconstitutional.

            The Communist Party USA is still around and even have a website.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              8 months ago

              Ah, fair, didn’t see that it got repealed. My original point was more to state that the legal system works against Communism, America is a thoroughly anti-Communist project both within and without.

          • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            Someone better tell these people they all could be arrested at any moment!

            https://www.cpusa.org/

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communist_Party_USA

            No but seriously it’s an unenforceable junk law that no one has bothered to take the time to repeal that was never even really used in the first place. I mean, the communist party runs candidates for office to this day. Someone finally tried to use it in 1972 to keep a communist candidate off the ballot and a federal district Court promptly ruled it unconstitutional.

            https://www.plainsite.org/dockets/1zey0ee5l/arizona-district-court/blawis-v-bolin/

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              8 months ago

              Ah, fair, didn’t see that it got repealed. My original point was more to state that the legal system works against Communism, America is a thoroughly anti-Communist project both within and without.

              • Ranvier@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                8 months ago

                I’d say more broadly the legal and political system works against any organizations that threaten the status quo, but yes America’s attitudes toward communism have been pretty obvious throughout the twentieth century. I just took issue with the idea that political parties or idealogies are illegal in and of themselves in the US, constitution still manages to protects some things.

          • force@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            “Communist Party” and “Communism” are not equivalent concepts

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              14
              ·
              8 months ago

              Who makes that distinction? Plus, the idea of destroying the state, Capitalism, class divides, and money definitely is legally opposed.

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Who makes that distinction?

                … literally anyone who thinks about it? The US Communist Party is one party, there are plenty of other parties that identify as communist. You don’t have to be called “The Communist Party” to be communist.

                Socialist Alternative

                Revolutionary Communist Party

                Workers World Party

                New Afrikan Black Panther Party

                Party for Socialism and Liberation

                Communist parties aren’t popular at all, but they’re far from banned. There are multiple such parties.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  11
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Laws are interpreted and wielded by those in power. The Democrats are already called Communists, what happens if a genuine Socialist party takes some amount of power?

                  • force@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    That’s literally an argument against anything that exists at all. That’s kind of how laws work, linguistics is complicated so everyone’s interpretation is different, and many people in power intentionally misinterperet laws. But as it stands, communist parties are not banned. What you speak of is a big “what if”, and currently you saying communism as a whole is banned is simply wrong, even as an oversimplification.

                    It is a big stretch to turn “Parties other than the two largest ones in the country have considerable cultural, legal, and logistical obstacles to being able to participate in high-level American politics, and an unenforced law from 70 years ago banned one specific communist party before most of the provisions being repealed by congress and the law being overturned in state courts as unconstitutional” into “Communism is banned in the United States”. There is no legal way to criminally prosecute someone on the basis of them being a communist, or belonging to any specific communist party at all, in the modern day.

                    I’m not trying to be condescending or anything btw.

              • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                Who makes that distinction?

                Anyone versed in basic political theory.

                An ideology and a political organization are obviously different. Just like republicanism and The Republican Party, democracy and The Democratic Party, socialism and The Socialist Party, etc.

                destroying the state

                That’s technically sedition, so, yes, illegal.

                Capitalism

                Nowhere in U.S. jurisprudence is “capitalism” (verbatim) explicitly protected as an economic system. The 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause prevents the state from taking someone’s life, liberty, or property without a proper justification under the laws of the land. The Constitution protects individuals from the government. Freedom to contract is a principle that underpins the basis for a free-market economy.

                After the Great Depression, the Court began to treat the freedom to contract as less than absolute, asserting that such freedom may be limited by the State’s interest to protect its citizens. Capitalism is a right guaranteed by the constitution but limited in scope to protect individuals against the dangers of laissez-faire capitalism.

                class divides

                There are no explicit laws in U.S. jurisprudence (that I know of or have turned up on brief internet searches) that enforce “class divides”.

                money

                Be it resources, precious metals, or legal tender, money is protected by the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

                So we can conclude that the advocacy or practice of communism isn’t itself illegal. Forcing people to practice it or overthrowing the government and dissolving The Bill of Rights in order to force people to practice most certainly is.

                In my opinion, that’s a good thing.

                • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  10
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Communism isn’t Communalism. Advocating for Communism and attempting to implement Communism at a national level is illegal, as you’ve shown.

                  • Rusty Shackleford@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    Communism isn’t Communalism.

                    Yes, that’s true.

                    Advocating for Communism

                    … is legal, under the 1st Amendment.

                    attempting to implement Communism at a national level is illegal

                    By force, yes. Theoretically, with a broad enough consensus, it could be voted on and enacted.

                    All pedantry aside, it’s important to differentiate between theory and practice or ideology and an organization.