• Ranvier@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    From the article:

    Viana said he didn’t know what charges the demonstrators faced but that some will likely be charged with disturbing the peace and others with trespassing.

    They also were apparently reading some city anti camping ordinance to the protestors.

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Why does the lawyer not know what the charges are? How were they arrested without being charged?

      • nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        Because when it comes to dealing with those opposing the US MIC, we’re already a fascist country. You have the freedom to do many things but this is not one of them. MLK killed after speaking out on Vietnam, Kennedy killed for much the same reasons; Vietnam and mulling changes at the CIA, Boeing whistleblower mysteriously ‘comitting suicide’ your freedom only extends to things that do not oppose the military.

        • WamGams@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 months ago

          MLK wasn’t killed because he spoke out against Vietnam.

          He was killed because he was abandoning a racial paradigm in favor of a class one. He was building a rainbow coalition.

          • TopRamenBinLaden
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            7 months ago

            Same with Malcolm X, and Fred Hampton. As soon as any of these men started talking about class unity, the people in charge immediately acted to get rid of them. Really shows how scary class consciousness is to the ruling class.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I get that, but I don’t know why this is even going before a judge if they were arrested without charge. I didn’t think that was legal.

      • Ranvier@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        This source suggests something about a judge not being present for an arraignment, and so they were released with instructions to present again in May. Sounds like they probably haven’t been formally charged with anything. You can be arrested without being charged, usually charges come shortly after an arrest. But they can’t hold you indefinitely with no charge, which is why they were just released with instructions to return on a certain date.

        https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/emerson-college-protest-arrests-divides-along-public-safety-vs-political-lines/ar-AA1nGB5t

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          You can be arrested without being charged, usually charges come after an arrest.

          Okay, I didn’t realize that. I thought they had to charge you with something if they arrested you. Thanks.

      • pearsaltchocolatebar@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        You can be arrested just because the cop felt like it. They typically have some time span in which to charge you or they have to let you go.

        Cops aren’t the ones charging you, that’s the DA.

    • Varyk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Right, I was wondering if any more clarified information had come out.

      Another commenter let me know that Boston basically made suburban camping illegal last year in Boston.