• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    6 months ago

    I guess I’m just not happy with the idea of some insurance company taking the hit. It still doesn’t hit cops directly enough even if their rates go up. Start making the union pay and maybe the union will make their members get in line.

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      6 months ago

      The advantage of having officers carry malpractice insurance is the same as it is with doctors. Eventually, the premiums to insure a bad officer get so high, no one is willing to pay them. Or, they simply uninsurable, as no company is willing to take on the risk. It also means there will be a large and politically connected organization (insurance companies) which have a financial interest in collecting data on bad police officers. Sure, that should be the government’s job, but since we know that’s not happening, why not exploit corporate greed for a positive thing?

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 months ago

      Insurance companies screw over everyone. That’s what they do. I’m okay with them sharing.

    • xmunk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Insurance companies are never mandated to take a policy - pushing up premiums is an effective way to discourage future bad behavior.