• webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    ·
    6 months ago

    NEET is is an economic label that means Not in Employment Education or Training. Its the group often looked down on as leeches in society but the term doesn’t consider the reasons or health of the person.

    The sister in the post appears much more like the Japanese shutins or hikikomori who isolate themselves from all social contact. Technically being a hikikomori is a choice but mental health and big pressure culture probably dont help.

      • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        Thats what i meant with “technically” a choice

        The ironic part in this is that ecologically/footprint speaking the impact might be pretty positive compared to going out.

        • CronyAkatsuki@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Yea, here where I live there is a culture of most jobs being seasonal work, so a good amount of people end up being NEET’s for about half a yera or less because of the lack of regular jobs and surplus of seasonal work that’s most times only 3-6 month’s long.

          You could say we are forced to be neet’s whenever tourist season isn’t ongoing.

          • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            22
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Thsts also what it was like it in medieval europe lord days. Peasants sow and harvested the lands but most of the year didn’t have much to do.

            Sounds alot better then the cant skip a paycheck or miss rent hustle culture.

            • Tar_Alcaran
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              27
              ·
              edit-2
              6 months ago

              Peasants sow and harvested the lands but most of the year didn’t have much to do.

              They usually ploughed two times before harvest, and had to harrow at least once. After the harvest you had to process it, so cleaning threshing and winnowing grain or cleaning fruits. You’d need to weed it, maybe even plough it again after sowing to flatten out the ground and cover the seed and bury the weeds. If you’re lucky, you can add some manure and if you’re unlucky you might to plough agaaaain to retain more water on the field.

              Of course those staple crops are in addition to the vegetable and herb garden, and any animals that need care every single day.

              And all of this is ignoring the housework, gathering firewood, cooking for today and preserving for winter, cleaning and mending clothes, making yarn and weaving fabric, down to simply fetching water. Just housework is a fulltime job (not 40 hours, but literally all the time) in de middle ages.

              And if you fall Ill, break a leg, have a fire or just have a shitty dry summer, the general solution to that is dying slowly and painfully.

              Subsistence farming sucks so hard, people worldwide literally chose indentured servitude as a preferable alternative on many occasions.

              • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                17
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                Both sides are true.

                Work itself was much harder and life itself could be called a struggle compared to today’s standards.

                But the attitude towards works was very different and much more broken up. Leisure in medieval times is well documented.

                “During times of high wages and good harvests, peasants could expect to work no more than 150 days a year.”

                https://www.thecollector.com/peasant-life-medieval-england/

                • Tar_Alcaran
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  6 months ago

                  “During times of high wages and good harvests, peasants could expect to work no more than 150 days a year.”

                  Ahhh this article again. It misses a hugely important bit of info: this work is ONLY for their lord. To translate it to a modern context:

                  During a brief period after the Plague, a peasant “only” had to work 150 days to “pay the rent”. If they wanted to do stuff like stay warm, wear clothes and eat, that came on top of those 150 days.

              • Fal@yiffit.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I have no idea where this propaganda that is wasn’t so hard being a feudal peasant came from but it’s just laughable

                • Socsa
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  It’s all the same anti enlightenment brain rot you see all over Lemmy. These people have convinced themselves that modernity is so terrible, they’d literally rather be slaves.

                  • Schmoo@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    6 months ago

                    It’s just wishful thinking that the solution to our current dysfunctional relationship to labor can be found in the past, ultimately driven by a failure of imagination. Sure a medieval peasant’s relationship to labor might have in some ways been better than today, but in most ways it was not. We can look at the past and learn from the positives only by acknowledging the negatives.

          • MeDuViNoX
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            I know it’s just a typo, but typing surplus like that makes me think of the type of Freudian slip a reptilian disguised as a human would have. 🤣

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      TIL NEET means something else. For I thought it was only an enterance test in India to get into medical education. It is super competitive and toppers are usually shut-ins, studying for 14-16 hours a day.

      The exams are held in may so for kids to go in hibernation since January is common place.

    • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Its the group often looked down on as leeches

      im still trying to figure out why people hate the fact that people leech off of shit.

      Like unless we’re going turbo functionalist society where we define suicide as a normal aspect of everyday life, it seems rather. Dystopian to be claiming that everybody must be a part of society.

      economists are fucking weird dude.