• streetlights@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    That we’re reading this educational policy change in the newspapers and not from a professional teaching group tells you that this is simply a political manoeuvre.

    These kids are already watching porn on their phones, you aren’t protecting them from anything by refusing to teach.

  • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Even if this was an actual problem, which it isn’t, this is not the way to deal with it. Children ask all sorts of awkward questions, not answering their question is literally the worst way to deal with it. They’ll just ask the question more loudly in a very clear voice in the middle of a crowded Tesco. It’s best to just answer them and move on.

    You can tell no Conservatives ever actually raised their own children.

  • ReCursing@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Section 28 bullshit all over again. It didn’t help anything then, it won’t help anything now, it will just hurt people. Fuck’s sake, what is wrong with this shites?!

  • Devi@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Because we all know 12 and 13 year olds never have sex. One study says nearly 3000 of them got pregnant between 2000 and 2007 but clearly immaculate conceptions all round.

  • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Because telling them “I’m not allowed to answer that question.” isn’t going to make them look it up themselves anyway. I mean, you could lie to them, but I can’t imagine that being a popular policy.

    Even if the sentiment behind this wasn’t so horrid, this’d still be stupid.

  • s12@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    If you’re going that far; just ban gendered pronouns altogether.

  • Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fair. No clue why we should be teaching children stuff like this.

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Stuff like this? Gender stuff?

      It’s been normal for schools to teach stuff like this for decades, stuff has been gendered in schools forever.

      The only recent change is giving children choices and recognising reality.

    • foo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Because some kids are different than others and need support and care so they can become the person they see themselves as

  • Wanderer@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    64
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good. Think too many people act like huge hormonal and surgical options are no big deal.

    Seen loads of trans people say they always knew. Well they won’t need to be told if they know.

    The UK has recently done research on the matter and realised that children were not getting the support required for not transitioning.

    • Ismay@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      That is so wrong.

      I’m 41. Figured it out around 36 because I never had the vocabulary to describe it and understand it. And I was miserable.

      That’s “don’t say gay” bullshit aimed at making us invisible. And you.ve regress from “no pu blocker” to “don’t talk about it”. Nice support.

      Enjoy your youth suicide rate…

    • Gamoc@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You are so incorrect that I’m amazed you were able to use a keyboard that must have been covered in your own drool. Go get a grip and use it to keep hold of a fucking clue.

    • Senal@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      The UK has recently done research on the matter and realised that children were not getting the support required for not transitioning.

      Citation?

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          The overview had no mention of a lack of support for “not transitioning” it’s certainly possible I’m missing it or it’s in the full report (which I’ll read when I get a few minutes).

          One mention of the need for corresponding levels of support for de-transitioning and some mentions of increased support for other issues alongside the gender based ones.

          It sounds like OP had a specific section/sections in mind, if this is indeed the report they were referencing I’d appreciate some indication to which part they were referencing specifically.

          “The overview didn’t mention it, but its somewhere in this 232 page report” isn’t the most useful when trying to understand where someone is coming from.

          • exocrinous@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Personally I think we should be giving kids a lot more support in not transitioning. And by transitioning, I mean transitioning from a girl to a woman or from a boy to a man. If the child isn’t 100% certain they want to go through with massive irreversible hormonal changes, they shouldn’t. I don’t care whether those hormones come from a pill or from a gonad. They can make an informed decision whether to continue with puberty when they’re 16-18

            • Senal@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              Do you have any information on how easy the resumption of puberty is after that sort of delay?

              It never occurred to me that this was possible and I’m interested in how it might work.

              • exocrinous@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                It’ll start right back up again completely naturally as soon as you stop taking the pills. The pills are hormone blockers. The gonads still produce sex hormones, but the blockers react with the hormones and render them inert. The inert hormones are passed as urine like any other waste product in the blood. A few days after you stop taking the blockers, they’ll run out and the sex hormones will start expressing themselves just like they would in someone who never took the blockers. Puberty will begin (or resume) just as nature planned.

                The only side effect is that you won’t go through puberty. Unfortunately, this does mean you’ll have a child’s amount of bone density, which is not good for a lifetime. But there’s absolutely 0 risk in delaying puberty until age 18. You’ll just grow up slower, the same as any late bloomer.

                Hormone blockers are actually a component in an adult trans person’s hormone replacement therapy. To take me as an example, I have a pair of testes which produce testosterone. So I take an antiandrogen; a testosterone blocker, to suppress the effects. And I take estrogen pills so that I have a female blood chemistry. When I started taking hormone pills, my body reacted just like any teenage girl’s body. I got softer skin, mood swings, and better hair. I tell you what, having the emotions of a teenage girl as an adult is an absolute trip. I’m glad they’ve settled down since then. Some trans women I know even got period cramps, despite not having a uterus. I don’t envy them.

                The body is genetically programmed to respond to sex hormones in a certain way. It doesn’t matter what you were born as, everyone’s organs, muscles, bones, and brain have a genetic programming that responds to estrogen one way, and testosterone another way. The potential is already inside every living human. That potential remains there for your entire life. Puberty blockers can’t do anything to take it away.

                If I ever stopped taking my testosterone blocker, I’d start growing bigger muscles and hair in strange places. My body would resume functioning like a male body. One day I’ll get my testes removed, and I’ll never have to worry about that again. But that surgery is only available to adults, and it requires a psychiatric assessment. I’ve been openly trans for years and years and I’m still not allowed to do it yet. There’s absolutely no risk of a child going through the procedure without the absolute greatest caution, and a very urgent, life-saving need. And even if a horrible one in a billion mistake was made, they could just give the kid hormone pills the same as I take in order to restore their original sexual chemistry.

            • floofloof@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              Personally I think we should be giving kids a lot more support in not transitioning. And by transitioning, I mean transitioning from a girl to a woman or from a boy to a man. If the child isn’t 100% certain they want to go through with massive irreversible hormonal changes, they shouldn’t.

              I think you’re underestimating the care and caution with which these decisions are approached. No one is rushing kids into transitioning. No one is imposing it on young people who are not sure. There are many safeguards to make sure transitioning only happens where it’s appropriate and the person fully understands and agrees to it.

              • exocrinous@startrek.website
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                No, that’s not true at all. I was pretty clearly nonbinary growing up, but every adult told me that natural puberty was a good thing and there was no way to avoid it. They didn’t tell me that puberty blockers were an option. They should have. It would only be 2 years after reaching natural puberty that I realised I was trans. 2 years of puberty blockers might have made a huge difference to my life. I was sure as shit rushed by every adult I knew into transitioning into a man, just because I was born with a penis.

                • floofloof@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Sorry, I misread “from a girl to a woman or from a boy to a man” in your first comment, so I misunderstood your intent.

    • Flax@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      A lot of people I grew up with who thought they were trans simply grew out of it. Many of them were pressured into it, or were doing it because they thought they weren’t masculine/feminine enough to fit with societal norms. Or just wanted to be different. I was pressured into it as well when I was younger and made to identify as non binary because “cis men are bad” and I couldn’t be a cis man in that friend group or something. Could have went worse.

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Case in point. Anyone who tries to argue against the agenda gets pressured out of it by being called a “murderer”.

        • Senal@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Labels aside, the only thing that post contains is a personal opinion, a personal anecdote and then an unspecific reference to something that may or may not exist.

          Calling that an argument is a very generous interpretation.

        • exocrinous@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          That’s not true, but I wish it was. I wish everyone who tried to argue against saving children’s lives was pressured out of it by being called a murderer. Instead, murderers like Robert Galbraith are freely appearing in parliament to argue in favour of this legislation.

          And I know you can’t tell from the headline, but this new rule against sex ed in schools also prohibits telling children what parts of their body are not okay for an adult to touch. Thanks to this new law, we will have a generation of children who are unable to report sexual abuse. Anyone who is in favour of this law is aiding and abetting pedophiles and getting children raped.