• beetus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I mean I hear you but the top three posts talk to a depressing dystopian present. Even this one reminds us of our past and current oppression.

        I trust many find comfort in these memes but all I see is reminders of a world I don’t like.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          Hey, if you read theory, it becomes obvious that Capitalism is unsustainable! Either we all die, or the future will move beyond it!

    • caboose2006@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Remember, it took the black death and like 1/2 the population dying to bring about this change

      • Denvil@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        I mean the black death was like 450 years before the French revolution… I think it just took some angry French people for change

        • flicker@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If anything I think our societal problem is that everyone remembers what happened to Robespierre.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    Divine right of kings simply morphed into capitalism. We didn’t get rid of jack shit, and we never will.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Feudalism is entirely different from Capitalism, which is entirely different from Socialism. Class dynamics have changed, and will change.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          It’s a fundamentally different stage of class society with fundamentally different mechanics.

          • burgersc12@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Fundamentally different? Lords are still in control, just now we call them “Billionaires” and act like the “Market” protects us.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Unlike serfs, workers must compete with each other as well as Capitalists. The Market protects nobody but the interests of Capital.

      • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        Feudalism is entirely different from Capitalism

        Not really, no. Even though feudalism doesn’t consider greed and resource hoarding inherently virtuous like capitalism does, both are at their core about the few rich and powerful exploiting and abusing the many poor and powerless through ownership of the necessities for life and a greater capacity for violence.

          • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            There are differences, yes, but they’re built on the same foundation and as such by definition NOT fundamentally different.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              They don’t have the same foundation. Aristocrat/serf dynamics are entirely different from Bourgeois/Proletarian relations.

              Reading Marx would help you.

              • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                Aristocrat/serf dynamics are entirely different from Bourgeois/Proletarian relations.

                They most certainly aren’t.

                Reading Marx would help you.

                I have. Guess what: he wasn’t right about everything.

                • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Serfs have a certified existence, they do not sell their labor in a market. They work their land, without participating in Capitalism.

                  Proletarians do not have a certified existence. They compete against each other in a labor market.

                  The difference is stark despite both being working classes.

    • essell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      I agree These systems both emerged from inherent humanity, not conspiracy.

      • undergroundoverground@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        7 months ago

        That would make sense for capitalism, if humanity didn’t have to have its permanent, essential characteristics beaten, traumatised and groomed out of them with land seizures, branding, whipping, workhouses, schools, prisons, debtors prisons, being forced to sell their children, slavery and the threat of homelessness and starvation for hundreds of years.

        People didn’t just accept either of those two systems and there’s nothing remotely inherent about them. They were both forced on people through violence or the threat of it.

        • essell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          .They were both forced on people through violence or the threat of it.

          And so is revealed the violence inherent to the system.

      • unreasonabro@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        “inherent humanity” - what a magical term. you might have a magical worldview! which means you won’t even recognize this as an insult, which is sad, but a little funny.

        • essell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          I can recognise nonsense when I see it, and viewpoints based on assumptions rather than evidence.

  • Phegan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Not to piss in the lemonade, but some places still have the divine right of kings.

    • maynarkh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      The point is that societies could progress past it, that it’s not inescapable.

      So the fact that there are still absolute monarchies does not invalidate that societies that are better are possible, like most of our societies today.

      Every empire seems unassailable and eternal, until it doesn’t. The USSR seemed like it will last beyond our lifetimes, until it didn’t.

  • Constant Pain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I met a traveller from an antique land,

    Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone

    Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,

    Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,

    And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,

    Tell that its sculptor well those passions read

    Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,

    The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;

    And on the pedestal, these words appear:

    My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;

    Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!

    Nothing beside remains. Round the decay

    Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare

    The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

    Shelley’s Poetry and Prose (1977)

      • Subverb@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        I just finished it two days ago. I agree completely.

        I will caution people that because of the writing style the beginning of the book (at least to me) is a bit disorienting. It takes a minute to find her rhythm.

    • Subverb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Funny this cropped up, I just finished The Left Hand of Darkness two days ago. Very good book with some beautiful prose.

      It was the first Le Guin book I’ve read. I’ll be reading more.

    • endlessvoid@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      I just finished the dispossessed. Didn’t find it as compelling as reviews had me hoping. The sci-fi depiction of anarchism wasn’t flattering and the main character wasn’t easy to like either.

      Spoiler and trigger alert: I put the book down for a while after he sexually assaulted a woman, but eventually finished it and wasn’t impressed by the ending or by the fact that his assault was glossed over and not mentioned again.

      • Rolando@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Yes, that’s a fair assessment. It’s not an enjoyable book and to some extent isn’t meant to be – the cover of the version I read said something about an “ambiguous utopia,” the story structure is pretty far from a Campbellian Hero’s Journey, and the main character is not relatable. The book is more memorable than enjoyable.

  • Auli@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Kings had nothing on capitalism. You could overthrow a king.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    The problem is that this time we’ve likely got a few decades at the most to form a movement before a huge chunk of the world becomes uninhabitable and society crumbles under the weight of war and famine.

    Looking at how things are going, I have little hope that the majority of people are willing to let go of the status quo.

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      We live in the most peaceful time in all of human history. It’s bad but not that bad.

  • Maeve@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    7 months ago

    I agree with the sentiment and also wonder if she’s still ferociously pro-copyright?

  • ditty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Is this quote from The Dispossessed? Or another of her many works?

  • BlackNo1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    the thought process has just been replaced with nepo baby billionaires who think they are special because they were shit out of the right vagina.