• JDPoZ
    link
    fedilink
    English
    2522 days ago

    Umm, how about we focus on actually getting a strong game industry for people working directly in it first… 😄 I mean… have people seen the layoffs just in the past two years within the game industry?

      • JDPoZ
        link
        fedilink
        English
        122 days ago

        I agree we need both, but it just feels a little lower priority… like if someone was giving a speech in a room filled with a bunch of starving children and said speaker was preaching about how we needed to “protect animal rights.”

        Like they’re not wrong, I guess, but it would seem kind of strange to focus on the welfare of cattle when there was obviously a much more dire situation of “kids starving in the room they’re in” that maybe should be the initial target of focus before someone talks about the ethics of free range vs organic food production.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          522 days ago

          They’re not really the same group so both can happen at the same time, and they would help each other.

  • @9488fcea02a9
    link
    English
    16
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Who is going to pay for it? Every time journalists try to get paid enough to eat and have a roof over their head people cry “paywall!!!”

    Or if they do ad supported people cry “ad infested cancer site!!” Or “lol adblock!”

    Just to be clear, i adblock the shit out of the internet. I prefer some kind of paid model, but i’ll get downvoted to hell for saying that. I’m not smart enough to have any good answers on how to pay journalists. But crying “paywall” at everything is not helpful…

    What i dislike is having to have an account and password for everything. There needs to be a better model/system for paying journalists (not just in gaming media)

    Currently the only business models are:

    1. ad filled clickbait
    2. billionaire backed media
    3. unpaid volunteer work
    4. paid subscription

    And it seems like the only sustainable ones in this day and age are 1 and 2 (to the detriment of our society)

    • Eggyhead
      link
      fedilink
      1922 days ago

      I always get a little annoyed when people imply consumers are at fault for what’s actually just shitty economic practices.

      I’m no economist, but ad-supported everything just seems like a stagnant bubble trying desperately not to burst by throwing more ads everywhere and calling you the bad guy for blocking them.

      • @ZOSTED
        link
        English
        622 days ago

        A hundred percent, but the fact remains that journalists have a very hard time supporting themselves in their profession. A job that is critical (when done well) to an informed public.

        It must be depressing knowing you could just take a TypeScript React bootcamp and probably double salary in a year. Like, journos have an important job. It’s just not lucrative, despite its value to people/society.

    • @sugar_in_your_tea
      link
      English
      6
      edit-2
      22 days ago

      You missed a huge one: merch. Gamers love gaming-related merch, so make a lot of it. Partner with game studios to prepare merch around big launches, and secure rights to make memey merch a bit after launch to keep the hype going. If done correctly, the journalists don’t need to sacrifice integrity in reviews because even flops can sell spicy merch.

      I think that could sell well. Start selling merch before launch, discount it right around launch, and then launch the memey merch right after launch.

      • Pietson
        link
        fedilink
        522 days ago

        Seems like such a company would quickly drop their journalism branch if it’s the merch that’s providing traffic and revenue.

        • @sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          English
          322 days ago

          But the journalism is what drives the merch sales, and they’re willing to pay more because of the association with the journalism. If you remove the journalism, you can’t charge as much for the merch.

          It’s like YouTuber merch, it generally costs quite a bit more than equivalent products elsewhere, but people buy it to support their favorite creators. That’s the angle here.

      • @9488fcea02a9
        link
        English
        322 days ago

        I’d rather just pay a subscriptiom fee (aka paywall) than buy some branded crap that i dont need…

        Like, whatever a creators markup is on a tshirt, i’d rather just give them that money in susbscription fee.

        Why would i buy a $55 tshirt and have have the creator take home $5? I’d rather just give them the $5

        • @sugar_in_your_tea
          link
          English
          122 days ago

          Sure, donations should absolutely be a thing, but I highly doubt donations are reliable enough to build a business on.

          • @9488fcea02a9
            link
            English
            122 days ago

            Exactly. Cant apply for a mortgage if you have an unstable income. Cant plan for having a family without stable income

            All the things we take for granted, we just expect journalists not to have because we are all entitled to their work for free

            • @sugar_in_your_tea
              link
              English
              1
              edit-2
              22 days ago

              I’m honestly fine paying a subscription if the content is good, but I highly doubt enough other people are to sustain a business. Plenty of people seem to be willing to buy merch or watch ads, so that’s probably where a games journalist should be looking.

    • @Cyberspark
      link
      English
      522 days ago

      There is patreon-supported or similar. There are also ad blockers that click the ads too to destroy your tracking profile. I’m not sure if they trigger click-through statistics for payment purposes.

      • @9488fcea02a9
        link
        English
        222 days ago

        Patreon is just another “paywall”

        • @Cyberspark
          link
          English
          322 days ago

          Only if it’s an actual wall. A lot of YT channels and even free games are supported by Patreon and similar.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 days ago

      I was there, 5000 years ago… Ads were unobtrusive and nobody cared about them. Then greed happened. Pop up ads, massive content hiding ads, privacy intrusive ads… not using Adblock now is like not using condoms.

    • @jnk
      link
      English
      222 days ago

      Maybe it’s just me, but the only topic where i see people consistently complaining about paywalls is in publicly-financed research articles behind a paywall, which should definitely not be legal and fuck universities doing that shit. As for general news i haven’t seen so much complaints, but then again, maybe i just wooooshed through them.

      Personally I don’t really care in this context because i can go to the source if I’m that invested and don’t want to pay, their job is to keep track and sometimes summarize what happens in the industry. Seems reasonable to either pay or invest my own time. Adblock is non negociable tho.

      • @9488fcea02a9
        link
        English
        122 days ago

        oh yeah, publicly funded research should 100% be open access to the public

        go visit any of the news subreddits/communities… any time people post a link to a news site there are a bunch of comments complaining about paywalls, or OP gets downvoted