• SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 months ago

      The reveal for example.

      Been a while since I read the book, and the reveal was similar, but a lot better in the movie

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        I don’t know what Reznor and Cash’s relationship was, but that has to feel so surreal for Reznor. You never see older artists cover newer ones in general, let alone such a legendary country artist cover a young alternative rock artist. If I were Reznor, that would be the thing that lets me die happy.

      • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        I’ve heard both versions probably a hundred times each and only hear Johnny Cash’s voice anymore.

    • Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 months ago

      I had never heard Trent Reznor’s original or Johnny Cash’s cover so thank you for mentioning it. What an incredible music video!

  • xmunk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Starship Troopers - the book was extremely meh - the movie is excellent (and very relevant to modern day).

    Clue - an excellent movie based off a fucking boardgame… ditto for Barbie now as well!

    Mage the Acension is a TTRPG love letter to Ars Magicka and it blows it out of the water.

      • ComradeSharkfucker@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        How would Hannah Arendt be relevant here? I read a short blurb about her philosophy especially in regards to authority but I haven’t seen starship troopers

        • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          A hexbear or lemmygrad user could better explain this one, but its a deep-cut satirical comment on how nations that market themselves as “free” (but aren’t), promote philosophies that group and demonize all their enemies into a single camp, and prop up writers like Arendt, who was one of the main ideological peddlers of western moral supremacy during the cold war.

          Losurdo has a lot of good articles on this and Arendt specificaly, and also Gabriel Rockhill has some good articles about this too.

          https://ia801609.us.archive.org/0/items/pdfy-dfBD-isycOcvHvqS/Domenico Losurdo -- Towards a Critique of the Category of Totalitarianism.pdf

          • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            I recently started reading Eichmann In Jerusalem, because I was aware it introduced the phrase “banality of evil” and always think of that in moral/ethical discussions about the real world (versus hypotheticals), and was immediately struck by how uncritical she was of zionism when it crops up in her reporting/writing. It’s almost like just a quirk of some of the heads of state that is used to explain their politics, rather than anything with more sinister implications.

            Perhaps this comes from some immature SJW-ish ideal that an author should always negatively represent harmful ideas—or maybe she does later and I’m just impatient—but it still strikes me as ironic that in the seminal work on The Banality of Evil, genocidal colonialism is treated as, well, banal.

    • arthur@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Helldivers 2 is heavily inspired by the movie… And I would say it’s better than it.

      PS: Mage - The Ascension ♥️

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        While I like the theme etc. of Helldivers 2, I do wish they went a bit further than that. This kind of satire is best when it forces small bits of unease on the audience, like the ending of Starship Troopers - “it feels fear!”, and everyone celebrates. There are bits and pieces surrounding the gameplay loop (e.g. something like “never talk to the enemy, destroy them for democracy”, forgot the exact line), but it’s rare enough to be easy to ignore.

  • Veraxus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The Mist

    That ending was one of the most brilliant gut-punches in film history. Stephen King himself said he wished he had written it.

  • Drusas@kbin.run
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    6 months ago

    Controversial, but Lord of the Rings. Tolkien wrote great stories, but his writing style always seemed kind of lackluster.

    • MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      I encourage you not to view him as an author but as an imaginative creator confined by language.

    • linearchaos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      6 months ago

      I can’t fault him for any of his depth and character building and poetry and storytelling and descriptive environments it was all very thorough and for the right person wonderful. I think the movies did a giant justice to making his work accessible. There are a lot of people out there that can’t manage to make their way through his poetry sections. And you can’t not read the poetry sections because there’s definitely content in there you need.

    • boatswain@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I came to this thread expecting to see this, and even with that expectation it makes me sad to see; to me the books are unarguably superior, to a large degree because Tolkien is such an excellent writer. I’d encourage anyone who’s bounced off the books a time or two to go back to them and try reading them aloud, even quietly to yourself: even though it’s prose, the text has meter and flow almost as strong as poetry. It’s undeniably a slow read, but it’s just such a beautiful one that the films, fun as they are, don’t hold up.

      Plus, Jackson’s Two Towers is garbage.

      • Drusas@kbin.run
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        It being better when read aloud actually nails what I dislike about it and, far more so, The Hobbit. They read like they were written to be told as tales around a fire, not to be read. So they don’t work particularly well as books that you read quietly to yourself (imo, obviously).

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    6 months ago

    Pretty much everyone who’s discussed it agrees The Godfather (film) blows the Puzo novel it adapted away.

    Runner up is Adaptation, an adaptation of the novel The Orchid Thief that expands its scope significantly.

    • Zahille7@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      The movies made me want to read the book. I still haven’t yet though.

      I still get chills when I hear “you’re nothing to me now, Fredo.”

    • Statlerwaldorf@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      The Godfather book has a lot of great character nuances but it also has a subplot of Sonny’s enormous dong being the only thing that could satisfy his wife’s bridesmaid’s enormous vagina.

  • SolidGrue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    2001: A Space Odyssey (1968), at the time of its release, was based on a short story called The Sentinel by Arthur C Clarke. In that story, the roots of the Tycho Monolith plot segment of 2001 of is sketched out, and then expanded as both a screenplay and a full-length novel.

    • Urist@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      In 1995, Dylan described his reaction to hearing Hendrix’s version: “It overwhelmed me, really. He had such talent, he could find things inside a song and vigorously develop them. He found things that other people wouldn’t think of finding in there. He probably improved upon it by the spaces he was using. I took license with the song from his version, actually, and continue to do it to this day.”

      Source

    • NotNotMike@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 months ago

      One thing that always stuck out to me about the book is the introduction of certain editions. The author writes about himself researching the history of the country the story takes place in and describes it as real, saying he took his son to a museum with Inigo’s sword and everything.

      I was Googling furiously when I read it because I was so confused. I was astounded that the place (and people) was “real”. It took a bit of research to find that the author just does this bit and hasn’t let it go since he wrote the book

      I’m still so charmed that he tricked me. It made reading the book that much sillier, for me

      • kromem@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 months ago

        I had a teacher that worked for the publisher and talked about how they’d have a series of responses for people who wrote in for the part of the book where the author says he wrote his own fanfiction scene and to write in if you wanted it.

        Like maybe the first time you write in they’d respond that they couldn’t provide it because they were fighting the Morgenstern estate over IP release to provide the material, etc.

        So people never would get the pages, but could have gotten a number of different replies furthering the illusion.

      • BaumGeist@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 months ago

        I have a similar story from a different medium:

        Frank Zappa has an album called Francesco Zappa. On the back of the sleeve, Frank describes finding out about a distant relative who composed and played music during the 18th century. After telling some friends about it, I got to thinking that Frank had invented another character (á la Ruben and the Jets), because that’s the kind of thing he would do, and felt very foolish for repeating this information uncritically.

        Years later I looked the album up on Wikipedia, and it turns out Francesco Zappa was a real musician in the 18th century (who was not actually directly related to Frank).

        He got me twice with one album.

  • funkless_eck
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    heres a controversial opinion: The American Office vs the UK Office.

    While I respect the original, Gervais’ external antics and the much meaner, darker humor just don’t create as good a comedy vehicle that enables the viewer to laugh and have fun and enjoy themselves watching the show

    • spongebue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      On that note, wasn’t Whose Line is it Anyway originally British? Because Drew Carey’s was peak!

      • funkless_eck
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 months ago

        Agree to disagree - to me the Uk office was a Gervais vehicle with the Tim/Dawn romance Christmas special episode as a nice bonus and Gareth as an occasional funny victim of his own hubris. Keith and Finchy having a couple of good scenes. Neil, Donna, Rachel, Jennifer, Jamie, Ralph… all very forgettable.

        In the US office, as mentioned, I think its a well rounded ensemble comedy where you can feel it’s a collab of a writers room and a complicit cast. Everyone has their favorite moments from pretty much any character…

        In the early 2000s I probably would’ve liked the UK office more because I was an edgy teen. 25 years later and after an 8 year run, 200 episodes vs 14 - I feel like I’d much rather turn on the US one if I wanted a laugh.

  • Mandy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 months ago

    Ill be killed for this but…Lord of the rings. Like, im sorry book purists but even after reading the books twice. Tolkien, is and always will be, THE high fantasy author, the one who basically made things we take for granted today. But the music from Howard Shore. So many scenes like from how fellowship began, to DEEEAAAATTTTHHH to Sam just being the broest bro to ever exist. I dont mind all of the cuts and changes they did, i happily return to the movies all year every year, the books? not so much.

    • EvanescentWave@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      The movies are awesome, but as a bookworm I would rather say they’re doing justice to their source material. I’m rereading more than rewatching, but I guess I’m not normal (And no worries, we book purists don’t kill people who have actually read the book)

    • RBWells@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I am an avid reader of books, and not a movie buff, but I stand on this hill with you. The LOTR movies are better than the books.