• barsquid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    7 months ago

    He won’t need to. They’re in the wealthy class so the son won’t get much jail time if any. Nobody interested in hiring him would give a fuck about this conviction.

    We have a two-tier system. It has been obvious for a while, but Donald getting $1,000 scoldings for sending Trumpanzees after the court’s staff and family has shone a spotlight on the discrepancy.

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s always been a 2-tier system, through all nations and all times.

      One of my favorite parts of Noble House, set in 1840s Hong Kong, was a Chinese guy disgusted with the English notion of “equal under the law”. “Of course there are different laws for the rich and poor! Why else would I strive to be rich?!”

      I think on that now and again.

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        I tried many, many times to read Noble House, but it was too long for me to get through it.

        Anywho, if I remember, wasn’t it set in the twentieth century?

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 months ago

      Pretty sure the judge had his hands tied for the max fine he could dole out to Trump. Still a problem that should be fixed but it’s not cause of the judge.

    • WldFyre@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      20
      ·
      7 months ago

      How on earth are trying to both sides this lmfao

      Learn to read

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        A leftist that points out inequality inherent in the system? What a strange thing to encounter on Lemmy. I’m positively flummoxed as to how this came about.

      • BakerBagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        It isn’t a “both sides” thing, it is a class thing. The wealthy never face consequences unless they personally perform some heinous act, and even then it isn’t guaranteed.

      • n3m37h
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 months ago

        Maybe you shoukd, Please re read his last paragraph

      • barsquid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I sympathize with being sick of bothsidesers, but I don’t think that’s what I’m doing here. The justice system is unfair as it is. Dems aren’t doing enough but Repubs want to make it even worse. If youths came out to vote in every election we wouldn’t be stuck with these two choices, but there is very clearly just one sane choice.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          If youths came out to vote in every election

          They did, and their candidate lost anyway. Too many olds spread across too many districts.

          Maybe if you can convince a few hundred thousand Youngs to move to Wyoming…

          • barsquid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Every election. The parties cannot count on the youth vote. They both seem to be acting like they don’t care what youths want. I am assuming a correlation there. Unfortunately it’s correlating in both directions.

            • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The parties cannot count on the youth vote.

              The youth vote isn’t a specific set of people. Its a continuous cohort of new voters entering the pool. And the parties are deeply wedded to the youth vote, in so far as they need to get their hooks in early in order to guarantee consistent turnout in later generations. Big investments in social media by partisan groups - from TPUSA to Joe Rogan sponsors - are predicated on winning over young people to right wing ideology. And Republicans consistently have some of the youngest elected party members because they aggressively recruit young people into leadership

              What can’t be counted on is the liberal party to engage with younger voting cohorts. You don’t see Democrats engaging with youth activist movements. You don’t see Democrats courting the college vote. You don’t see Democrats attempting to seat ideological 20-year-olds in city councils or state legislatures and build up the back bench. You don’t see the national party investing in professional party workers under the age of 30. Liberalism is the party of stoggie old dinosaurs telling their grandkids to shut up and vote for them, then getting mad when they only win 60-70% of the youth vote and still lose.

              When liberal democrats burn out in their 30s and 40s, because they’ve been lied to and betrayed over and over again, all we get from the liberal party is “The other guys are worse, though!” As though that shit was ever a winning strategy.