• RustyWizard@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Copyright terms are so fucking stupid. Imagine getting into trouble for using Popeye. Make it the same as a patent duration and be done with it.

    • Blaze@reddthat.comOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      5 months ago

      You can really see how invested the copyright owners were to get such long durations.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      I feel like it should be the life time of the creator of the work provided that person is still getting a significant percentage of the royalties. Otherwise something like 20 years.

      That way companies might be less likely to force artists to sign away all rights to their work. So like “hey this kid could live another 50 years, so lets make sure he gets his percentage so we can keep control longer.”

      • Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        How would that work for anything produced by a company? If you’re a continuing run of stories, and a random artist dies, copyright on parts of your product suddenly evaporate? Getting a job as an artist would be like making an insurance claim: with a risk assessment. Good luck getting work as you get older or sick.

        • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Why would a copyright entering public domain cause a problem with your product? Public domain doesn’t mean you can’t use a work anymore, more the opposite really.

          And they’d still get 20 years for a work made by a 90 year with a terminal illness.

      • threelonmusketeers
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Could companies not also say “hey, this kid could live another 50 years, let’s kill them soon so their work will be in the public domain and we can profit from it”? Or would companies not want the work in the public domain?

    • Heavybell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I dunno what the patent duration is, but copyright should probably just be 50 years max IMO. If you can’t make bank in that time without changing the idea up (and thus getting 50 years on the new version) you don’t deserve it.

      • gerbler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 months ago

        Originally I think it was closer to 20 years. Frankly I think 25 years is plenty. A quarter century is enough time to reward the creator of an IP and it respects the fact that all IP is built on top of the public domain so it’s return is a natural part of the cycle.

        • Heavybell@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          In any case it’s not like after it expires you could not trade on being the original. It’s not like others could then come along and claim to have been the original creator. And if you kept making works those would each get their own period of copyright.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I agree with copyright in a sense that people should have a chance to profit from their ideas before it gets stolen, but you are right that it is way too long of a term. It stymies creativity when people can milk the same idea for many decades.

      I would think for creative license like an idea for a cartoon or comic, 10-20 years is more than enough. Then they should try and make new characters or start competing with others trying to improve the character.

  • sik0fewl@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Snow White and the seven dwarves are 200 years old and already in the public domain.

    • marilynia@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      The stories are, but not the characters as drawn by Disney, it’s like classic music, you can use the Music commercially (given that you Perform I), but you can’t use a performance from someone else.

      Same with classic stories, you can make your own snow white story, but you can’t use snow white as performed by Disney (yet)

  • Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    I want all of them to live together in one big house, reality TV style!!

    … it appears there are mockups:

      • AEsheron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Yeah, they had shifted for a Trademark strategy a few years before it happened. It was pretty clear they weren’t interested in making it happen again, or had finally got pushback from the folks they donated to about it, or something. And if Disney decided to drop it, I don’t think WB, with less than half the cash, will decide to try it.

  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    5 months ago

    I wonder if this will herald an era of more original content and less of all this reusing of stuff all the time.

    • AProfessional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      It won’t change anything. Old stories and characters are boring. Studios do it from time to time but like Robinhood movies aren’t great investments and since they don’t own the IP don’t lead to anything else.

      Community made content is just for fun, so who cares if people make repetitive fan films, art, games.

  • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Donald Duck is gonna be fire, I just know it.

    Also, Disney has no rights to Snow White, they merely own the 7 very specificly named dwarves.

  • glimse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    I appreciate you posting here often but this is not a data visualization. This is just a graphic with dates on it

    • brbposting
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I see it as a way of visually presenting (character, year) data points.