• acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Maybe at some point the Americans will get scared that the Chinese are actually making strides ahead of them in electrification and decarbonization to actually get unstuck from their idiotic culture war over fossil fuels.

      • umbrella@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        5 months ago

        and will lash out for being behind for as long as they still have guns

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        The space race is on. That’s why Starship has been launching so much. Someone at the FAA must have finally realized that if SpaceX doesn’t go ahead at full SpaceX speed, we’re gonna see China take over space.

        They’ve got a space station and a rover on the moon. China will easily overtake us in space, has already in a few places.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Fossil fuels aren’t just a culture war. Energy is really important for people, including poor people.

      • acargitz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        5 months ago

        Poor people also care about not dying from the effects of climate change.

        Poor people don’t care about the megaprofits of the oil, gas, and automotive industries.

  • naturalgasbad@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    To the best of my knowledge, this is the first commercially-funded (i.e., non-government) nuclear fusion reactor. Notable investors are MiHoYo (developers of Genshin Impact), Nio (Chinese EV company), and Sequoia Capital…

    • kippinitreal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      In your guys opinion, is that good or bad? Privately funded would mean proprietary & profit driven implementation for such a crucial technology (if successful). I personally don’t like it.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        The CPC still maintains a lot of influence over companies even when they’re getting their funding from private industry as part of their “politics in command” strategy for controlling market forces. We’ll see how it plays out.

      • Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        Any path that takes us to unlimited clean energy is the right one IMO. We could always do a little espionage and make our own domestic fusion drive eventually.

      • intensely_human@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t mind profit driven because I’m confident that free markets are good for everybody.

    • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      No??

      I’ve supported engineering at several privately funded nuclear fusion companies, though all of them, this Chinese company included, are building a product out of public school research.

      Off the top of my head there’s:

      • CFS
      • TAE technologies
      • Thea
      • Zap Energy

      And several more…

      • naturalgasbad@lemmy.caOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Building, or built? Either way, maybe these companies will come out with a better design than Tokamak, but until then they’re literally just research ventures because the vast majority of investment at actually scaling fusion is happening for Tokamak tractors.

        • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          Built, physically operational reactors that operate as close to Q=1 as they can, with all the diagnostics included.

          The diagnostics are very important, as plasma instabilities have been, and continue to be, the critical issue preventing anything useful coming out of our decades of fusion reactor design. All these companies are sharing data on overcoming plasma instability issues, with multiple geometries aimed at evaluating how plasma responds to different inputs in different environments. We’re all trying to understand how to control and compress something far too hot to physically touch.

          @[email protected] scaling fusion isn’t a trivial problem, and saying it like it is indicates a lack of background knowledge. This isn’t a competition between companies (no matter what our CEOs suggest), as we in industry quietly all agree that any of us that cracks this unchains humanity from the solar system. Because government funding has unfortunately sucked so much ass, we’re sort of using private money to get the basic research done. We’d be so much farther ahead otherwise.

  • user134450
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    In the image of the discharge you can clearly see that the device has no cladding. That means a discharge would be limited to a duration of a few seconds, otherwise the material ablated from the wall would lead to extreme heat losses of the plasma. Did they include a future vessel cladding to the plasma volume calculation in the article?